Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Education > Algebra help > Re: "table of s...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 6 Topic 1948 of 2149
Post > Topic >>

Re: "table of sign" question re: differentiation

by Paul Sperry <plsperry@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jan 14, 2008 at 06:20 PM

In article
<549c7b39-82d3-4a3d-967a-3747240ef45c@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Dougsd1r <dougsdir@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> My question is why create a full table of sign?
> 
> Here is a sample question
> 
> f(x) = 5x^3 - 3x^5
> 
> calculate the coordindates of the stationary points and the nature of
> each stationary point.
> 
> here is the solution
> 
> f'(x) = 15x^2 - 15x^4
> f'(x) = 15x^2(1 - x^2)
> f'(x) = 15x^2(1+ x)(1 - x)
> 
> so the x coordinates of the stationary points are  0, -1 and 1
> 
> the stationary points are therefore  (-1,-2) , (0,0) and (1,2)   so
> far so good
> 
> now in the example the text book answer draws a table of sign to
> determine the nature of the S.P.s
> 
> http://i14.tinypic.com/6jq79kp.gif
> 
> is there a reason for drawing out the sign for each factor of 15x^2 -
> 15x^4
> 
> ie 15x^2 ,   (1+ x),  (1 - x)
> 
> when you can just calculate the sign of f'(x) using 15x^2 - 15x^4

The reason for using the factors is because it is usually easier. You
already have f'(x) factored: f'(x) = 15x^2(1 + x)(1 - x). To test the
sign of f'(x) between, say, 0 and 1, pick an "easy" point between 0 and
1 and test the signs of the factors. If you pick 1/2, 15x^2 is
positive, 1 + x is positive and 1 - x is positive; "(+)*(+)*(+) = (+)"
so f'(x) is positive and f(x) is increasing.

It is certainly OK to check f'(x) instead of the factors but frequently
you can check the factors in your head while you need to do a little
work to calculate f'(x). In this case, since 15x^2 is always positive,
you can ignore it altogether.

Note that the second factor in the first table should be 1 + x 
not x - 1; the values in that row are correct (for 1 + x).

[...]

-- 
Paul Sperry
Columbia, SC (USA)
 




 6 Posts in Topic:
"table of sign" question re: differentiation
Dougsd1r <dougsdir@[EM  2008-01-14 08:06:04 
Re: "table of sign" question re: differentiation
Paul Sperry <plsperry@  2008-01-14 18:20:28 
Re: "table of sign" question re: differentiation
Dougsd1r <dougsdir@[EM  2008-01-14 11:26:16 
Re: "table of sign" question re: differentiation
Paul Sperry <plsperry@  2008-01-14 21:02:53 
Re: "table of sign" question re: differentiation
Dougsd1r <dougsdir@[EM  2008-01-14 16:49:05 
Re: "table of sign" question re: differentiation
"[Mr.] Lynn Kurtz&qu  2008-01-16 04:54:06 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Nov 20 16:10:22 CST 2008.