On these two threads I've started, I wondering, have I said enough in terms
of clarification of my objectives, to get a result?
Cheers.
"Jack" <jj@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:EKqQj.251244$833.94482@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:7pjsntiqk3fs$.4eaycx81ywvj$.dlg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 18:52:36 +0100, Jack <jj@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> wrote in <news:EToQj.60181$_h7.47121@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> in
>> alt.algebra.help:
>>
>>> Take x and y to be integers.
>>> If we have a set P(m) comprising the first m primes beneath a value z,
>>> and a
>>> general subset J of of P(m), then I am constructing a matrix M_1 in
>>> which
>>> the members of J index the rows.
>>
>>> I am also constructing an array M_[x,y] comprising black cells and
white
>>> cells. The number of black cells in a column is given by t(n,M_[x,y]).
>>> Will
>>> it be acceptable in a mathematical paper to devise a form of notation
>>> referencing an interval [x,y] in such a way that the values of
>>> t(n,M_[x,y])
>>> over [x,y] conform precisely to the divisibility distribution that is
>>> exhibited in an interval [x,y] M_1?
>>
>> I can't tell from this description just what you're trying
>> to do.
>>
>
> Let a(J) be the product of all members of J.
> I'm trying to construct an array in which the black cells do not
> necessarily conform to the distribution of occupied matrix components
in
> the matrix M_1. I am considering subintervals [x,y] in the interval that
> is the product of all members of J. But I am also wondering if I can
> devise a form of notation in which I indicate that the distribution of
> black cells in my array, for some [x,y], do indeed conform to the
> distribution found for [x,y] in M_1. Ideally I want to have an array in
> which all the black cells in columns indexed by integers 0 to 2a(J)
> conform to the same distribution as do the occupied matrix components
M_1.
> But I also want there to be other subintervals in the array such that
this
> conformity does not apply. This will mean I don't have to keep switching
> between a matrix and an array. It's just that I don't know whether that
> sort of thing is done.
>
> With thanks.
>
|
