by Your name <fake@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
May 3, 2007 at 03:04 AM
"Tony Tuso" <tonytuso@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
news:t9_9h.628$T05.222@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I remember seeing a question regarding the 169 addresses, but can't
> remember the exact question.
> The answers included two 169 addresses:
> 169.254.0.0
> 169.245.0.1
>
> Are both these addresses invalid?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
ancient message but I'll answer it anyway. 169 addresses are usually
automatically assigned when a dchp server is looked for but not found by a
comp. This is true of windows comps, not so sure about other os
