On DLtruth,
jackson Wrote:
>Two mathematicians read the paper on Ultranet, based upon the messages I
still have in my archive. One non->mathematician also read it. Don't
expect me to spell it all out for you. Andrew Beckwith has a PhD in
>mathematics, as far as I know, and another in physics. His posts on
sci.math are already in the public records -- >don't expect me to do your
homework for you.
>As for Beckwith being eccentric -- this is also quite well-known on the
Internet.
>So quit putting it out as if I am trying to protect anything related to
IQ.
>And go take your Haldol, you ****ing psychotic twit.
How can anyone even believe what you say, that "Two mathematicians
read the paper on Ultranet, based upon the messages I still have in my
archive" ?
You won't publish such messages in your "archive", right? How
convenient. We only have what you say to go on. Ha! What a joke you
are, Quinn!
And you hoist "eccentric" Beckwith as an example of a mathematics
reviewer. Aha! You're disparaging Beckwith and forestalling
criticism to stop others from pointing out his eccentricity and thus
undermining YOUR credibility. So you both give Beckwith as an
example, then undermine him before anyone undermines YOU!
You're a sneaky evil bastard, Quinn. You can't be intellectually
honest for one second.
Even more, in this very thread, you said:
"Beckwith's PhDs are in physics and mathematics, I believe ... can't
recall from where. Yes -- he's quite the character -- but there's one.
A whack of published papers behind 'm if recollection serves me
right."
Hey Quinn, you represent, you allege, you put forth (where's my
thesaurus?) that Beckwith maybe has a PhD in Math, but you hedge and
say "I believe ... can't recall from where" and you think Beckwith may
have published "papers" ... "if recollection serves me".
So, Quinn, these are facts??? You pull **** out of your ass and we
should just accept what you say are diamonds?
Quinn, you are intellectually dishonest! High IQ? Ha!
Then Quinn, you say in this thread:
"So essentially this is all about my not revealing the name of the
second math person who read the paper and said it stood. If you belong
to a group, and one of the rules of member****p is that other members'
info is to be kept confidential -- it is unethical to reveal that
information."
That, of course, ASSUMES you are telling the truth, Quinn, about the
"closed list" and its "rules" which you are ethically bound to obey.
(cough hack cough bull**** hack cough cough*)
How can ANYONE verify a single thing you say, with lame
representations of such "facts" about that infamous "closed list"?
If it can't be verified, you can say anything you like, right?
No, Quinn, you can't say what you like, since others like me take your
evasiveness not as ethical or noble, but craven and pathetic, as well
as egotistical and self-serving. Sooooo convenient for you, and so
sad for those seeking the TRUTH!
Well, you protect James Harris, and the company you keep and your
behavior with that company reflects on YOU, Quinn.
Quinn, you've been challenged, measured, and found wanting.
I've said it for years: "closed list" = sheer bull****.
Also, oooo, you're calling me psychotic. I should SUE YOU FOR LIBEL!
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
There's an old joke: if you call me psychotic again, I'll KILL YOU!!!
But that's a joke, and I've never said I'd kill you.
But I've also said that Quinn, you shouldn't KILL YOURSELF or DIE OF
PAINFUL AIDS! Nope, you shouldn't DIE DIE DIE, QUINN, DIE DIE DIE.
Eh, go back to your closet ... I mean "closed list", Quinn, where your
"buddy" James Harris awaits to comfort your hurt feelings with a good
internal massage with his HAMMER!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"closed list" "closed list" "closed list"
"personal space" "personal space" "personal space"
Hey Quinn, I'm laughing at the "superior intellect"
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
|
