Cary Kittrell has conceded that Dr. Rex Curry's historical discoveries are
correct. http://rexcurry.net/cary-kittrell-arizona-edu.html
Kittrell became familiar with Dr. Curry's famous revelation that the USA's
early pledge of allegiance to the flag (1892) used a straight-arm salute
and
it was the source of the salute of the monstrous National Socialist German
Workers' Party. Dr. Curry (author of "Pledge of Allegiance Secrets")
helped
to establish that it was not an ancient Roman salute, and that the
"ancient
Roman salute" is a modern myth that grew during and after the lives of
Edward Bellamy (1850-1898) and Francis Bellamy (1855-1931).
http://rexcurry.net/book1a1contents-pledge.html
Kittrell has also helped to call attention to Dr. Curry's discovery that
the
German flag and its swastika was used sometimes to represent overlapping
"S"
letters in alphabetic symbolism for "socialism" under the National
Socialist
German Workers' Party. http://rexcurry.net/book1a1contents-swastika.html
Cary Kittrell does not even attempt to dispute Dr. Curry's work. Kittrell
has conceded Dr. Curry's work so many times that Kittrell has been reduced
to nothing more than sputtering off-topic childish insults. He has given
up
on making the slightest factual assertion regarding Dr. Curry's work.
Kittrell recently commented in regard to Dr. Curry's famous amicus curiae
brief to the United States Supreme Court. According to Kittrell, Dr.
Curry's
noted brief is "matched in sweep only by his motion, regarding the same
case, suggesting that '...one, some or all Justices recuse
himself/herself/themselves from any consideration" of the case."
Kittrell was referencing Dr. Curry's fame as the first lawyer to educate
the
United States Supreme Court about the Pledge as the source of the NSGWP
gesture.
http://rexcurry.net/pledgewonschik.html
A new do***entary video movie exposes the shocking facts on youtube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BssWWZ3XEe4
and here http://rexcurry.net/pledge-of-allegiance-rexcurrydotnet.wmv
and on google video
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4377628546479871943
and teacher tube
http://www.teachertube.com/view_video.php?viewkey=77b16a03aa81f09499f2
Dr. Curry is also well-known as the first lawyer to make a motion to
recuse
all of the United States Supreme Court justices in a case.
http://rexcurry.net/pledgewonschikrecusal.html
Kittrellwood followed his first comment about Dr. Curry with an idiotic
comment expanding Kittrell's self-humiliation: "If all the Supes recused
themselves from the case, would the outcome be determined by a softball
game
between the interns and the clerks?"
Aside from Kittrellwood's oddball fantasies about interns and clerks, the
comment shows Kittrell is apparently not a lawyer and probably should not
pursue that profession.
Almost immediately after his remark, Kittrellwood was schooled about the
United States Code (28 USC section 2109 and see below) that specifically
deals with cases in which enough of the justices recused themselves that
they couldn't field a quorum (six out of nine) and they had to resort to
using a panel of appeals court judges. Kittrell was also schooled about an
actual case in which it had occurred in the early 1940s: U.S. v. Aluminum
Co. of America (Alcoa), 148 F.2d 416 (2nd Cir. 1945).
After Kittrell's self-humiliation, Kittrell could only reply sheepishly
"Very interesting, thank you."
Kittrell also gave no hint of any knowledge that a supreme court justice
DID
recuse himself in a Pledge of Allegiance case on a ground similar to one
mentioned in Dr. Curry's motion. In the previous recusal, Justice Scalia
recused himself for remarks that Justice Scalia had made about the phrase
"under God." The argument for recusal in Dr. Curry's motion is even more
compelling for any justice who chanted the pledge for twelve years in
government schools. "Under God" is only two words and Scalia's remarks
justifying recusal were few. Justices who recited the pledge in school
and
elsewhere not only repeated the two words, they repeated the entire
pledge,
and it is a "pledge of allegiance" to the party on the indictment, and
deifying that party (the government).
Kittrellwood shows that he does not even understand the point of the
recusal
motion. He shows that he does not understand how the motion met with many
successes. Kittrell is too ignorant to realize that the motion was not
intended to result in every justice recusing himself, and the motion does
not state that. The motion was the first of its kind, it educated the
Court
about the Pledge's putrid past, and it gained a lot of attention, and
helped
to educate the general population. It is still educating people, as
Kittrell
demonstrated in his embarrassing fa****on.
Cary Kittrell deserves partial credit for not actually disputing any of
Dr.
Curry's work. Not only is Kittrell incapable of saying anything in dispute
of Dr. Curry's work, but Kittrell also has no web site to which he refers,
and he has nothing to sell that anyone would pay for, and his only
sup****ter
(Kitrell's sock puppet?) does not even know the word "vexillological" and
"she" spells it incorrectly all the time.
**************************
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode28/usc_sec_28_00002109----000-.html
(and see below).
28 USC §2109. Quorum of Supreme Court justices absent
If a case brought to the Supreme Court by direct appeal from a district
court cannot be heard and determined because of the absence of a quorum of
qualified justices, the Chief Justice of the United States may order it
remitted to the court of appeals for the circuit including the district in
which the case arose, to be heard and determined by that court either
sitting in banc or specially constituted and composed of the three circuit
judges senior in commission who are able to sit, as such order may direct.
The decision of such court shall be final and conclusive. In the event of
the disqualification or disability of one or more of such circuit judges,
such court shall be filled as provided in chapter 15 of this title. In any
other case brought to the Supreme Court for review, which cannot be heard
and determined because of the absence of a quorum of qualified justices,
if
a majority of the qualified justices shall be of opinion that the case
cannot be heard and determined at the next ensuing term, the court
shall enter its order affirming the judgment of the court from which the
case was brought for review with the same effect as upon affirmance by an
equally divided court.
And it has happened that enough of the justices recused themselves that
they
couldn't field a quorum (six out of nine) and they had to resort to using
a
panel of appeals court judges. It was an anti-trust case against Alcoa in
the early 1940s, eventually decided as U.S. v. Aluminum Co. of America,
148
F.2d 416 (2nd Cir. 1945).
NEWS FOR CARY KITTRELL http://rexcurry.net/nazi%20salute%209b.jpg
CARY
KITTRELL
|
