BaJoRi wrote:
> "clifto" <clifto@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:s7u3f5-f1r.ln1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> BaJoRi wrote:
>>> "clifto" <clifto@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:d951f5-quo.ln1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> BaJoRi wrote:
>>>>> You do realize that the guy forwarding this theory has been proven
to
>>>>> not
>>>>> even have a science degree from an accredited learning institution,
>>>>
>>>> So it should be really, really easy for you to mention facts that
shoot
>>>> holes in his theory.
>>>>
>>>>> has
>>>>> posited these types of theories in the past (and been wrong),
>>>>
>>>> Cite.
>>>>
>>>>> has faced
>>>>> fraud indictments
>>>>
>>>> Cite.
>>>>
>>>>> and is a convicted felon,
>>>>
>>>> Cite.
>>>>
>>>>> and is generally a quack?
>>>>
>>>> I like him a whole lot better than I can tolerate you.
>>>
>>> Because you don't like people who can actually read.
>>
>> No, I intensely dislike people whose only tactic is ad hominem. You
>> delivered 100% personal attack and 0% fact.
>>
>>> Here is a name: look
>>> him up. Google should do fine. Luis Sancho. Have fun.
>>
>> You made the assertions, you provide the evidence. Once again all I
have
>> is a name you accused, just more ad hominem. 100% personal attack and
0%
>> fact.
>
> It's quite simple, really, even for someone of your obvious intellectual
> deficiency:
You have absolutely no control over this psychosis, do you?
--
"[I]t's not surprising, then, that they get bitter, they cling to guns or
religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant
sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."
-- Barack Obama at a meeting with his equals, the elitist bourgeoisie
|
