israeliteknight <israeliteknight@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>Most of our testing organizations have become bastions of feminism,
>teaching "gender equality" AND "racial equality" at the same time
>that their own tests prove that the gender and race gap are
>INCREASING, dramatically.
The only gap that is increasing dramatically is that between reality
and what p***** for "thought" in your strange nincompoop anatomy.
>For example, at a time when 55% of college admissions were women, only 10
>of 244 applicants to the University of Texas were women and 234 were
>men.
Since the U of Texas had a lot more that 244 applicants, common sense
shows that you pulled this out of your strange orifice. In order for
your statements to be true (55% women admissions, and only 10 women
applicants), the entering class at U of Texas would have to have been
exactly 10 women and 8 men, or in the same pro****tion but less. Since
there has been no class at the U of Texas with only 18 members or
fewer, your nonsense is clearly seen for what it is,.
> More significantly, there were 8 male applicants for every one
>female applicant at the 650 score level, 60 at the 700 level, 32 at
>the 750 level, and 26 at the 800 level. And there were no female
>applicants above the 850 level compared to 61 male applicants.
The silliness of your statistics is laughable, even if you actually
had a clue what you were saying.
>If this scenario is typical, and we have zero evidence that it's not,
[guffaw]
We have zero evidence that you are sane.
>then to achieve 55% female admissions, our universities must reject
>226 of the most qualified applicants [most of the male applicants] in
>order to accept the very least 10 qualified applicants, the female
>applicants, and only 8 male applicants.
Well, I see you've learned arithmetic. Now provide the evidence that
the University of Texas only admitted 18 students in some year.
>Is it at all possible that our universities are routinely rejecting
>97% of the most qualified male applicants in order to achieve their
>"gender" goal of "equal admissions" for women, and other "minorities"?
No it is not possible. Since males are roughly half the population,
for universities to reject 97% of male applicants, then no more than
6% of the population could be attending college. Since in fact the
percentage is a lot higher, your numbers are demonstrated to have been
processed out of your strange orifice.
>And exactly WHO are the 97% who're DENIED admission to the very
>universities that their fathers and Forefathers spilt blood to create
>and protect?
When did anyone spill blood to protect a university? The closest that
I can think of was when VMI, which was at the time more a high school
than a college, turned out its cadets during the civil war, as part of
the lost cause of the South.
lojbab
Bob LeChevalier - artificial linguist; genealogist
lojbab@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lojban language www.lojban.org
|
