Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homo***uality:

On Sat, 10 May 2008 06:15:32 -0700, Peter Franks
<none@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>buckeye wrote:
>> Peter Franks <none@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> 
>>> :|buckeye wrote:
>>> :|> Thursday, May 08, 2008
>>> :|> 
>>> :|> The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homo***uality:
>>> :|
>>> :|Who/what is an example of the "Religious Right"?
>> 
>> Ahhhhhh, the man who never runs out of questions expecting others to do
his
>> homework and or research for him.
>> 
>> My answer is:
>> Are you totally helpless? Look it up yourself.
>
>This is a discussion forum.  I'm attempting to discuss the topic.  Dump 
>and run posting is not appreciated.

No, you're a troll

If you want to "discuss" that kind of crap, then YOU
must accept the fact that a "religious right" does
exist, that it has financial and political clout, and
not evade by asking  for a "citation" that it's "there"

Secondly, you must recognize that NO ONE can prove the
so-called god-inspired laws are in fact true---that in
order to argue things like "homo***uality"---you
require somone to accept biblical things as "fact" or
true

No one says YOU can't,  on a matter of faith, accept
those things without proof, but you cannot require
others to do so too.

It is a "fact" that they're in the bible----but it is
not a provable fact that they were ever "god-given"
laws.