Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homo***uality:

On May 10, 3:53=A0pm, "pba...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <pba...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> On 10 mei, 21:36, Josh Rosenbluth <jrosenbl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 10, 3:34=A0pm, "pba...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <pba...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > wrote:
>
> > > On 10 mei, 20:12, Josh Rosenbluth <jrosenbl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > On May 9, 7:07=A0pm, Peter Franks <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > > Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
> > > > > > On May 9, 4:24 pm, Peter Franks <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > > >> buckeye wrote:
> > > > > >>> Thursday, May 08, 2008
> > > > > >>> The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homo***uality:
> > > > > >> Who/what is an example of the "Religious Right"?
>
> > > > > > James Dobson.
>
> > > > > Thanks.
>
> > > > > What is unreal regarding his understanding of homo***uality?
>
> > > > That is not primarily an immutable trait, but rather is a chosen
sin=

> > > > to be treated like every other sin.
>
> > > Nobody chooses to be a homo***ual.
> > > Some choose to hide it, some choose to reveal it,
> > > but having a ***ual preference for ones own *** is not by choice.
> > > Moreover unlike murder and stealing, one does not hurt others by
being=

> > > a homo***ual.
> > > I suppose you know that very well, so I suspect you to be a liar.
>
> > I suppose you have problems with reading comprehension.
>
> Sorry what did I mis?

The part where I answered the question:

"What is unreal regarding *HIS* (emphasis added) understanding of
homo***uality

Josh Rosenbluth