Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homo***uality:

On May 10, 9:41=A0pm, "Jeff Strickland" <cr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Josh Rosenbluth" <jrosenbl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
news:2aa79cd1-5079-495b-b79f-1a89b02078e6@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On May 10, 5:28 pm, Peter Franks <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
> > Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
> > > On May 9, 7:07 pm, Peter Franks <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >> Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
> > >>> On May 9, 4:24 pm, Peter Franks <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >>>> buckeye wrote:
> > >>>>> Thursday, May 08, 2008
> > >>>>> The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homo***uality:
> > >>>> Who/what is an example of the "Religious Right"?
> > >>> James Dobson.
> > >> Thanks.
>
> > >> What is unreal regarding his understanding of homo***uality?
>
> > > That is not primarily an immutable trait, but rather is a chosen sin
> > > to be treated like every other sin.
>
> > Sorry -- I don't follow.
>
> You can't change an immutable trait (you are what you are). =A0Dobson
> thinks homo***uality is not immutable, but rather chosen. =A0And since
> it is chosen, you can choose not to be gay. =A0That's unreal.
>
> <JS>
> Dr. Dobson is not unique in that belief.

Yes, there are others of the religious right who are equally unreal.

> He merely vocalizes that which many people believe.
>
> I believe that what Dr, Dobson has said isn't that you choose to not be
ga=
y,
> he says you choose to be gay. The natural state of being is to not be
gay,=

> therefore this would come without a choice. The choice, Dr, Dobson would
> say, is to violate the natural state of being, and choose to be gay.

That's unreal.

Josh Rosenbluth