Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homo***uality:

Peter Franks <none@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>:|buckeye wrote:
>:|> SkyEyes <skyeyes9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>:|> 
>:|>> :|On May 9, 1:24 pm, Peter Franks <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>:|>> :|> buckeye wrote:
>:|>> :|> > Thursday, May 08, 2008
>:|>> :|>
>:|>> :|> > The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homo***uality:
>:|>> :|>
>:|>> :|> Who/what is an example of the "Religious Right"?
>:|>> :|
>:|>> :|John Hagee.  Jerry Falwell (who fortunately is no longer with us).
>:|>> :|Pat Robertson.  Rod Paisley.  And a *host* of others.
>:|>> :|
>:|>> :|Those are just the cult ringleaders.  Want examples of their
political
>:|>> :|lackeys?
>:|>> :|
>:|>> :|Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
>:|>> :|EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
>:|>> :|skyeyes nine at cox dot net
>:|> 
>:|> Peter is Playing you. He is the man who never runs out of questions
>:|> 
>:|> Entering Radical Religious Right into google produces the following
in 0.49
>:|> seconds  
>:|
>:|Except YOU aren't talking about the RRR.  Check YOUR post and YOUR
subject.


more silliness I see. 

I am not restricted apparently as much as you are.  I can move from
trheads
easily and effortlessly  when there is a rreason to or a point to be made.

Remember this 

Me
My reply:
This is what happens when the RRR. . .

you
What is "RRR"?

me
Most who read these particular newsgroups already know what it stands for.
However, for those who don't 
Radical Religious Right

you
Ok, thanks.
What is an example of the RRR?


me
Are you totally helpless? 
Look it up.

you
Your post, your use of terminology, you substantiate it.

me
One doesn't generally have to substantiate that which is fairly well
recognized.

Radical Religious Right is a term that is generally recognized and
understood by most in these various newsgroups.

BTW, I substantiate it each and every time I post in with my signature.

I wonder if you are smart enough to find it in that signature. 
*****************************************************************************
>:|buckeye wrote:
>:|> Thursday, May 08, 2008
>:|> 
>:|> The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homo***uality:
>:|

you
Who/what is an example of the "Religious Right"?

me
Ahhhhhh, the man who never runs out of questions expecting others to do
his
homework and or research for him.

My answer is:
Are you totally helpless? Look it up yourself.


SkyEyes <skyeyes9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>:|On May 9, 1:24 pm, Peter Franks <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>:|> buckeye wrote:
>:|> > Thursday, May 08, 2008
>:|>
>:|> > The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homo***uality:
>:|>
>:|> Who/what is an example of the "Religious Right"?
>:|
>:|John Hagee.  Jerry Falwell (who fortunately is no longer with us).
>:|Pat Robertson.  Rod Paisley.  And a *host* of others.
>:|
>:|Those are just the cult ringleaders.  Want examples of their political
>:|lackeys?
>:|
>:|Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
>:|EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
>:|skyeyes nine at cox dot net

Peter is playing you. He is the man who never runs out of questions

Entering Radical Religious Right into google produces the following in
0.49
seconds  


He was/is  perfectly capable oftdoing the same but his M.O. is the game of
asking endless questions. 

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=radical+religious+right&btnG=Google+Search


Results 1 - 50 of about 338,000 English pages for radical religious right.
(0.49 seconds) 

[excerpt]

Exposed!: Unmasking the Agenda of the Radical Religious Right ...
Exposed! The radical religious right in the US is destroying the US
Constitution piece by piece. See the proof for yourself as the RRR sites
are Exposed!
http://rainbowsendpress.com/exposed/

Analysis of radical religious right attitude towards homo***uality 2007
W/O
Jun 28 '07 (Updated Jul 06 '07)
http://www.epinions.com/content_5049262212

[end excerpt]

8888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888

In case you haven't figured it out yet the above is an example of your
pattern in action.  Your games as I call them.    


It might be over your head bt I suspect others will see it and know waht I
am  talking about

BTW you said in another reply that I addressed earlier today that you were
trying to have discussions.


The above pattern of yours does not indiacte one trying to have
discussions, but more like one playing games.  


***************************************************************
You are invited to check out the following:

The Rise of the Theocratic States of America
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocracy.htm

American Theocrats - Past and Present
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocrats.htm

The Constitutional Principle: Separation of Church and State
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html

[and to join the discussion group for the above site and/or Separation of
Church and State in general, listed below]

HRSepCnS · Historical Reality SepChurch&State
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HRSepCnS/

***************************************************************
.. . . You can't understand a phrase such as "Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion" by syllogistic reasoning.  Words
take their meaning from social as well as textual contexts, which is why
"a
page of history is worth a volume of logic."  New York Trust Co. v.
Eisner,
256 U.S. 345, 349, 41 S.Ct. 506, 507, 65 L.Ed. 963 (1921) (Holmes, J.).
Sherman v. Community Consol. Dist. 21, 980 F.2d 437, 445 (7th Cir. 1992) 
.. . . 
****************************************************************
USAF LT. COL (Ret) Buffman (Glen P. Goffin) wrote 

"You pilot always into an unknown future;
facts are your only clue. Get the facts!"

That philosophy 'snipit' helped to get me, and my crew, through a good
many combat missions and far too many scary, inflight, emergencies.

It has also played a significant role in helping me to expose the
plethora of radical Christian propaganda and lies that we find at
almost every media turn.

***************************************************************** 
       THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE: 
    SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE 
	
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
****************************************************************