On May 10, 11:39=A0am, Bob LeChevalier <loj...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> israeliteknight<israelitekni...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >Of the 281,421,906 who participated in the 2000 US Census, NONE of
> >them said they were not a member of a race
>
> Probably because it wasn't an option on the form.
>
> >Don't spend too much time listening to logjam, who's about the only
> >other person on the entire planet who spouts such nonsense and who
> >might agree with you.
>
> Do you really need cites proving this silly claim wrong? =A0How about
> the geneticist Luca Cavalli-Sforza?
>
> >The races are actually different SPECIES.
>
> All of world of biological science disagrees with you.
>
> >Blacks are a separate SPECIES from Asians,
>
> Disproof: Tiger Woods (among others)
>
> >who're a separate SPECIES from Eastern Europeans,
>
> The percentage of Russians with Tatar blood is quite high.
>
> >who're a separate SPECIES from Western Europeans, who're a different
> >SPECIES from the British Isles, who're a different SPECIES from
> >Spaniards.
>
> Just think of all those people of each of your so-called "species"
> that freely and productively interbreed.
>
> >When we've managed to identify 22 THOUSAND different
> >SPECIES of orchids,
>
> which of course do NOT freely and productively interbreed. It's a lot
> easier for plants to become separate species, since they don't move.
> Once separated by enough distance through slow propagation over many
> generations, they inherently have no reason to maintain interbreeding
> capability, so they don't.
>
> >we can certainly identify the many different SPECIES of "people", don't
y=
ou think?
>
> If we could, we would. =A0But in fact there is no basis to do so.
>
> The genetic variation among human beings is far less than among most
> species.
> "The average pro****tion of nucleotide differences between a randomly
> chosen pair of humans (i.e., average nucleotide diversity, or p) is
> consistently estimated to lie between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 1,500. This
> pro****tion is low compared with those of many other species, from
> fruit flies to chimpanzees...." =A0And 85% of that minimal variation
> occurs within inhabitants of each
continent.http://www.nature.com/ng/journ=
al/v36/n11s/full/ng1435.html
> See
alsohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_%28classification_of_human_being=
s%29
>
> >The differences between these different SPECIES of orchids are minute
>
> and you know this how?
>
> Not only are there more species than there are in all the Mammalia,
> there are more genera.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orchids
>
> >compared to the VAST differences between the "White Race" and the
> >"black race".
>
> There is no "white race" nor a "black race". =A0And as stated, there are
> no identifiable differences that hold across all members of any of the
> various populations people have tried to identify as "races".
>
> >25 African nations have average iq's lower than Koko the Gorilla,
>
> No. =A0But you obviously do.
>
> >you're closer to the gorilla SPECIES than you are to the "White Race".
>
> That would not follow even if true, since IQ has nothing to do with
> breeding interfertility. =A0After all, some human female had your kids,
> before giving you the boot. =A0Alas, if your kids prove fertile, that
> means that nincompoop isn't a separate species. =A0Though whence came
> that strange orifice that noisome material exudes from is a mystery to
> all biologists.
>
> lojbab
> Bob LeChevalier - artificial linguist; genealogist
> loj...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=A0 Lojban languagewww.lojban.org
Do you ever get tired of contradicting yourself? First, you claim
"biological science disagrees" that there are DIFFERENT and DISTINCT
races or SPECIES of "people", then you claim the RACE of Russians has
been tainted with "Tatar blood"!!!???:
<<<>The races are actually different SPECIES.
All of world of biological science disagrees with you.
>Blacks are a separate SPECIES from Asians,
Disproof: Tiger Woods (among others)
>who're a separate SPECIES from Eastern Europeans,
The percentage of Russians with Tatar blood is quite high.>>>
You make this argument because you KNOW Tatars are a FOREIGN RACE to
the Russians, and that you hope to prove that the Russian RACE is not
pure.
And that is PURE BS.
To this DAY, the Tatars are a separate and distinct RACE, and neither
the Finns nor the Russians would DARE mix their holy seed with them.
Furthermore, there are 800 Tatars in Finland [they are mamzers with
Turkish blood who practice Islam], and THEY would never mix with
Finns, nor Russians, either, so how could Russian blood be tainted
with Tatars?
Russians have also occupied Latvia for more than half a century. Even
though Lativans have offered them $2,000 each to GET OUT [a LOT of
money to a Russian], they refuse to leave and they still constitute
40% of the population. Yet neither Latvians nor Russians, who are
both WHITE, have ever intermarried with each other. They are SEPARATE
AND DISTINCT RACES OF WHITES.
It's much less likely that a Russian would mix with a Tatar.
By trying to prove there are no SPECIES, you proved that you KNOW
there are!
|
