Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Education > Education General > Re: The Religio...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 50 of 168 Topic 12205 of 13599
Post > Topic >>

Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homo***uality:

by buckeye <buckeyeelo@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 12, 2008 at 07:26 AM

"Jeff Strickland" <crwlr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>:|I believe that what Dr, Dobson has said isn't that you choose to not be
gay, 
>:|he says you choose to be gay. The natural state of being is to not be
gay, 
>:|therefore this would come without a choice. The choice, Dr, Dobson
would 
>:|say, is to violate the natural state of being, and choose to be gay.
>:|
>:|</JS>

For your education 

Jews are a better analogy to Gays:
http://jonrowe.blogspot.com/2005/06/jews-are-better-analogy-to-gays-than.html


***************************************************************
You are invited to check out the following:

The Rise of the Theocratic States of America
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocracy.htm

American Theocrats - Past and Present
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocrats.htm

The Constitutional Principle: Separation of Church and State
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html

[and to join the discussion group for the above site and/or Separation of
Church and State in general, listed below]

HRSepCnS · Historical Reality SepChurch&State
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HRSepCnS/

***************************************************************
.. . . You can't understand a phrase such as "Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion" by syllogistic reasoning.  Words
take their meaning from social as well as textual contexts, which is why
"a
page of history is worth a volume of logic."  New York Trust Co. v.
Eisner,
256 U.S. 345, 349, 41 S.Ct. 506, 507, 65 L.Ed. 963 (1921) (Holmes, J.).
Sherman v. Community Consol. Dist. 21, 980 F.2d 437, 445 (7th Cir. 1992) 
.. . . 
****************************************************************
USAF LT. COL (Ret) Buffman (Glen P. Goffin) wrote 

"You pilot always into an unknown future;
facts are your only clue. Get the facts!"

That philosophy 'snipit' helped to get me, and my crew, through a good
many combat missions and far too many scary, inflight, emergencies.

It has also played a significant role in helping me to expose the
plethora of radical Christian propaganda and lies that we find at
almost every media turn.

***************************************************************** 
       THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE: 
    SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE 
	
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
****************************************************************
 




 168 Posts in Topic:
The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-09 05:02:11 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-09 13:24:28 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-09 15:21:40 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-09 16:07:36 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 08:16:04 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-13 04:46:05 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-13 07:13:26 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-14 03:54:24 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
SkyEyes <skyeyes9@[EMA  2008-05-09 16:02:08 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-09 16:44:12 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
cary@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-05-10 00:53:50 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-09 18:16:51 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
cary@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-05-10 01:22:25 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-09 18:41:57 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 08:11:23 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-10 14:30:06 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 16:14:39 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-10 17:18:57 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-12 07:31:02 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-12 07:30:11 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
cary@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-05-14 22:34:07 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"Bugman" <jm  2008-05-14 18:45:13 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
cary@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-05-15 00:30:36 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
grayshockley@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-19 02:52:22 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
cary@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-05-10 00:45:45 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-09 20:00:01 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
cary@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-05-10 01:20:50 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-09 18:21:25 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
cary@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-05-14 15:31:35 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-10 05:42:44 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-10 06:14:41 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-11 12:13:15 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-10 05:22:20 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-10 06:15:32 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 08:21:11 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-10 14:32:37 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-11 07:12:16 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-10 11:12:26 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-10 14:28:46 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"pbamvv@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-10 12:34:13 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-10 12:36:51 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"pbamvv@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-10 12:53:44 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-10 13:17:08 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
roneal@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-10 18:10:17 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-10 18:34:20 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-11 01:41:42 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-10 21:28:58 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-11 07:41:01 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-11 08:52:45 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-12 07:26:09 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-13 08:04:30 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-05-13 05:07:30 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-15 04:38:58 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-11 08:57:39 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-11 11:06:27 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-11 15:06:50 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-11 17:24:23 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-11 18:55:31 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-12 09:25:45 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-11 22:22:47 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-12 09:28:06 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-12 12:50:04 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-12 19:25:57 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
cary@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-05-14 16:11:37 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-12 07:29:54 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-11 18:54:14 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-11 19:41:44 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-11 17:26:43 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-11 22:02:07 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-12 09:30:10 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-12 14:38:56 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-11 18:53:22 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-12 07:31:32 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-12 09:31:10 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
cary@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-05-14 16:00:21 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-10 18:56:08 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-11 02:16:36 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-10 21:32:58 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-11 02:49:35 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-10 23:32:30 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-11 08:27:05 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-15 04:40:23 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-11 07:43:47 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-13 08:04:03 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-15 04:40:08 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-10 19:26:44 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-11 02:41:38 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-11 08:02:16 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-11 07:46:45 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-15 04:39:31 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-10 19:45:45 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"Bob T." <bo  2008-05-10 20:17:43 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-11 16:38:58 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-11 19:40:00 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal MIS-Understanding of Homosexual
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-11 19:05:58 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
cary@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-05-15 00:28:47 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-15 08:35:34 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
cary@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-05-15 14:44:21 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"Mark K. Bilbo"  2008-05-16 11:16:57 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-15 04:36:45 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-15 04:41:46 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"pbamvv@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-11 06:10:51 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
mizlee <mizlee@[EMAIL   2008-05-11 10:32:17 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-11 17:28:38 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-11 19:06:52 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-12 07:29:19 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"Bob T." <bo  2008-05-11 19:29:24 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-12 09:51:52 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-12 19:24:49 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Jenny6833A <Jenny6833A  2008-05-12 10:36:27 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-13 01:00:17 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-12 21:51:08 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-12 21:44:31 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Jd <ZionsFire@[EMAIL P  2008-05-21 01:02:47 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-20 21:49:35 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-23 00:44:54 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-22 19:53:41 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-23 01:38:09 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-23 08:35:35 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-23 23:16:54 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-24 00:09:11 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-25 00:43:55 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-24 19:54:14 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-24 23:38:58 
Re: Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexual
Topaz <mars1933@[EMAIL  2008-05-25 11:43:48 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
cactus <cactus@[EMAIL   2008-05-28 08:20:14 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-23 15:33:39 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-23 23:16:55 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-24 00:10:23 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-25 00:43:56 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-24 23:45:30 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-22 21:43:44 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-23 23:16:57 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-24 00:15:14 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-24 07:35:25 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-25 00:43:58 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-25 08:22:45 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-25 00:43:57 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-24 23:46:32 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-23 08:33:45 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-23 23:16:58 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-24 00:19:48 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-25 00:43:59 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-24 23:52:08 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-28 00:10:44 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-27 23:48:36 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-30 01:04:00 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-29 22:16:29 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-30 23:57:03 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-30 21:09:21 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-31 02:34:27 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-31 03:54:34 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
The Chief Instigator <  2008-05-31 05:06:45 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"Mark K. Bilbo"  2008-05-31 11:42:00 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-06-01 01:24:12 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"Mark K. Bilbo"  2008-06-01 10:32:51 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-06-04 01:49:13 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
bushhelpscorporationsdest  2008-05-24 20:39:36 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-13 07:14:38 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-13 07:18:57 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-13 07:20:32 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-13 04:42:54 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-13 11:35:26 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-13 15:04:09 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-14 07:16:58 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-13 14:54:46 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-13 17:17:45 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Pubkeybreaker <pubkeyb  2008-05-14 10:21:11 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Dec 1 22:05:06 CST 2008.