Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Education > Education General > Re: The Religio...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 65 of 168 Topic 12205 of 13242
Post > Topic >>

Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homo***uality:

by buckeye <buckeyeelo@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 12, 2008 at 07:29 AM

Peter Franks <none@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>:|
>:|I'm not defending Dobson -- I don't even know who he is or what he 
>:|practices/preaches.


Dobson? OH well hell, he is one of the RRR leaders. 

Had you done as I suggested, that being to enter RRR into Google you would
have discovered that.

Democrats & Liberals:: The Theocrat-Plutocrat Crash
James Dobson, a top theocrat, said he was told by Karl Rove that:.
"Harriet
Miers is an evangelical Christian; that she is from a very conservative
church, ...
www.watchblog.com/democrats/archives/002809.html 

Focus On Fred: Religious Right Leader Dobson Blasts Thompson ...
So what’s a theocrat to do? Dobson hasn’t signaled which candidate he
likes
best yet. Unable to find a candidate pure enough for his extreme ideology,

http://blog.au.org/2007/09/20/focus-on-fred-religious-right-leader-dobson-blasts-thompson-again/

James Dobson - SourceWatch
Robert Unruh, "James Dobson : Self-Im****tant and Whining Theocrat," AP,
March 9, 1998. Ron Fournier, "James Dobson is at war with congressional
Republicans ...
 http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=James_Dobson

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=dobson++theocrat++&btnG=Google+Search

Focus on Dobson - Bang the Drum
Dobson is simply a theocrat. Look no further than his endorsement of Mike
Huckabee during the primaries for evidence of it. He is as
anti-conservative as he ...
politics.drumsnwhistles.com/2008/03/focus-on-dobson/ - 34k - Cached - 


Marc Ambinder (February 05, 2008) - Dobson Blasts McCain
Feb 5, 2008 ... He is basically suggesting that one must be a Theocrat in
order to be a Conservative. I don't know how Dobson and his gang has
hijacked the ...
marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/02/dobson_blasts_mccain.php - 

YouTube - James Dobson In Nashville
Mar 11, 2008 ... Dobson is a fascist theocrat, he's like the American
version of the Taliban. a4nyc2003 (2 weeks ago) Show Hide ...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6S0REtiR7M - 99k - Cached - Similar pages

YouTube - James Dobson In Nashville
Dobson is a fascist theocrat, he's like the American version of the
Taliban. a4nyc2003 (3 weeks ago) Show Hide. -1 Poor comment · Good comment
....
www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6S0REtiR7M&feature=related 

Theocrats or theofascists? The Religious Right’s true colors
The vast majority of the American public thought people like Dobson -- and
Sen. ... Hynes: The book really started because the word “theocrat” was
just ...
www.onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_1180.shtml - 35k - Cached - 

Dobson's Crusade: Ushering In An Officially 'Christian America ...
Were Leland able to debate Dobson, he'd make short work of the would-be
theocrat. "The notion of a Christian commonwealth should be exploded
forever," ...
findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3944/is_200410/ai_n9437311 - 42k -

***************************************************************
You are invited to check out the following:

The Rise of the Theocratic States of America
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocracy.htm

American Theocrats - Past and Present
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocrats.htm

The Constitutional Principle: Separation of Church and State
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html

[and to join the discussion group for the above site and/or Separation of
Church and State in general, listed below]

HRSepCnS · Historical Reality SepChurch&State
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HRSepCnS/

***************************************************************
.. . . You can't understand a phrase such as "Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion" by syllogistic reasoning.  Words
take their meaning from social as well as textual contexts, which is why
"a
page of history is worth a volume of logic."  New York Trust Co. v.
Eisner,
256 U.S. 345, 349, 41 S.Ct. 506, 507, 65 L.Ed. 963 (1921) (Holmes, J.).
Sherman v. Community Consol. Dist. 21, 980 F.2d 437, 445 (7th Cir. 1992) 
.. . . 
****************************************************************
USAF LT. COL (Ret) Buffman (Glen P. Goffin) wrote 

"You pilot always into an unknown future;
facts are your only clue. Get the facts!"

That philosophy 'snipit' helped to get me, and my crew, through a good
many combat missions and far too many scary, inflight, emergencies.

It has also played a significant role in helping me to expose the
plethora of radical Christian propaganda and lies that we find at
almost every media turn.

***************************************************************** 
       THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE: 
    SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE 
	
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
****************************************************************
 




 168 Posts in Topic:
The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-09 05:02:11 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-09 13:24:28 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-09 15:21:40 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-09 16:07:36 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 08:16:04 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-13 04:46:05 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-13 07:13:26 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-14 03:54:24 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
SkyEyes <skyeyes9@[EMA  2008-05-09 16:02:08 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-09 16:44:12 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
cary@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-05-10 00:53:50 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-09 18:16:51 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
cary@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-05-10 01:22:25 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-09 18:41:57 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 08:11:23 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-10 14:30:06 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 16:14:39 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-10 17:18:57 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-12 07:31:02 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-12 07:30:11 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
cary@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-05-14 22:34:07 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"Bugman" <jm  2008-05-14 18:45:13 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
cary@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-05-15 00:30:36 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
grayshockley@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-19 02:52:22 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
cary@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-05-10 00:45:45 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-09 20:00:01 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
cary@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-05-10 01:20:50 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-09 18:21:25 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
cary@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-05-14 15:31:35 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-10 05:42:44 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-10 06:14:41 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-11 12:13:15 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-10 05:22:20 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-10 06:15:32 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 08:21:11 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-10 14:32:37 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-11 07:12:16 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-10 11:12:26 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-10 14:28:46 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"pbamvv@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-10 12:34:13 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-10 12:36:51 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"pbamvv@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-10 12:53:44 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-10 13:17:08 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
roneal@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-10 18:10:17 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-10 18:34:20 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-11 01:41:42 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-10 21:28:58 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-11 07:41:01 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-11 08:52:45 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-12 07:26:09 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-13 08:04:30 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-05-13 05:07:30 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-15 04:38:58 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-11 08:57:39 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-11 11:06:27 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-11 15:06:50 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-11 17:24:23 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-11 18:55:31 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-12 09:25:45 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-11 22:22:47 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-12 09:28:06 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-12 12:50:04 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-12 19:25:57 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
cary@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-05-14 16:11:37 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-12 07:29:54 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-11 18:54:14 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-11 19:41:44 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-11 17:26:43 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-11 22:02:07 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-12 09:30:10 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-12 14:38:56 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-11 18:53:22 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-12 07:31:32 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-12 09:31:10 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
cary@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-05-14 16:00:21 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-10 18:56:08 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-11 02:16:36 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-10 21:32:58 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-11 02:49:35 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-10 23:32:30 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-11 08:27:05 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-15 04:40:23 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-11 07:43:47 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-13 08:04:03 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-15 04:40:08 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-10 19:26:44 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-11 02:41:38 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-11 08:02:16 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-11 07:46:45 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-15 04:39:31 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-10 19:45:45 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"Bob T." <bo  2008-05-10 20:17:43 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-11 16:38:58 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-11 19:40:00 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal MIS-Understanding of Homosexual
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-11 19:05:58 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
cary@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-05-15 00:28:47 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-15 08:35:34 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
cary@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-05-15 14:44:21 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"Mark K. Bilbo"  2008-05-16 11:16:57 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-15 04:36:45 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-15 04:41:46 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"pbamvv@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-11 06:10:51 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
mizlee <mizlee@[EMAIL   2008-05-11 10:32:17 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-11 17:28:38 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-11 19:06:52 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-12 07:29:19 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"Bob T." <bo  2008-05-11 19:29:24 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-12 09:51:52 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-12 19:24:49 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Jenny6833A <Jenny6833A  2008-05-12 10:36:27 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-13 01:00:17 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-12 21:51:08 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-12 21:44:31 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Jd <ZionsFire@[EMAIL P  2008-05-21 01:02:47 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-20 21:49:35 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-23 00:44:54 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-22 19:53:41 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-23 01:38:09 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-23 08:35:35 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-23 23:16:54 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-24 00:09:11 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-25 00:43:55 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-24 19:54:14 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-24 23:38:58 
Re: Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexual
Topaz <mars1933@[EMAIL  2008-05-25 11:43:48 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
cactus <cactus@[EMAIL   2008-05-28 08:20:14 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-23 15:33:39 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-23 23:16:55 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-24 00:10:23 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-25 00:43:56 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-24 23:45:30 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-22 21:43:44 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-23 23:16:57 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-24 00:15:14 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-24 07:35:25 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-25 00:43:58 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-25 08:22:45 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-25 00:43:57 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-24 23:46:32 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-23 08:33:45 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-23 23:16:58 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-24 00:19:48 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-25 00:43:59 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-24 23:52:08 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-28 00:10:44 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-27 23:48:36 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-30 01:04:00 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-29 22:16:29 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-30 23:57:03 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-30 21:09:21 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-31 02:34:27 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-31 03:54:34 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
The Chief Instigator <  2008-05-31 05:06:45 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"Mark K. Bilbo"  2008-05-31 11:42:00 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-06-01 01:24:12 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"Mark K. Bilbo"  2008-06-01 10:32:51 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-06-04 01:49:13 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
bushhelpscorporationsdest  2008-05-24 20:39:36 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-13 07:14:38 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-13 07:18:57 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-13 07:20:32 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-13 04:42:54 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-13 11:35:26 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-13 15:04:09 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-14 07:16:58 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-13 14:54:46 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-13 17:17:45 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Pubkeybreaker <pubkeyb  2008-05-14 10:21:11 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Wed Oct 15 15:53:25 CDT 2008.