Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homo***uality:

On May 12, 10:25=A0pm, Peter Franks <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Nick...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 May 2008 09:28:06 -0700, Peter Franks
> > <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >> What part(s) is/are unreal? =A0Chosen behavior, sin, and/or
treatment?
>
> > That he would believe an unscientific claim, that he'd
> > accept an unprovable collection of stories, fables and
> > lies as IF it were truth.
>
> Ok, in a broader sense, is anything that is unprovable not true?

You are missing akey point (and Nick did too).  It's not that Dobson
accepts accepts something based on faith alone which is unprovable but
still might be true.  It's that he accepts something which the
evidence strongly indicates is false.

Josh Rosenbluth