Re: Wikipedia Promoting Global Warming Hysteria?

Cary Kittrell wrote:
> In article
<fae6cffd-9200-4400-9460-7a4abfcc3edb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
"leonard78sp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <leonard78sp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>>  Wikipedia Promoting Global Warming Hysteria?
>>
>>  Noel Sheppard, NewsBusters.org
>>
>>  Two weeks ago, a parent-teacher council blamed the
>>  online research source Wikipedia for falling test scores
>>  in Scotland.
>>
>>  On Tuesday, Canadian columnist Lawrence Solomon
>>  blamed Wikipedia for helping to spread global warming
>>  hysteria around the world. The connection? Oftentimes
>>  "inaccurate or deliberately misleading information"
>>  published by Wikipedia being taken as fact by
>>    unsuspecting readers.
>>
>>  In the case of climate change, such inaccurate or
>>  deliberately misleading information acts to solidify the
>>  myth being espoused by Nobel Laureate Al Gore as
>>  millions of people across the globe believe Wikipedia
>>  is a purely factual resource.
>>
>>       [Eco-fascists and islamofascists right or wrong
>>        get preference in every dispute]
> 
> Lessee here, on one hand we've got someone who froths
> "Ecofascists", but provides nothing beyond that.
> 
> On the other hand, we've got the National Academy
> of Sciences, the creme de la creme of scientific
> overachievers in this country.
> 
> What to choose, what to choose?....
> 
> -- cary

Oh, offhand I'd say you should believe those who say that there is an 
'underlying warming trend' even though there hasn't been any warming for 
a decade and we don't yet have access to temperature records for the 
next fifty years...