Re: Wikipedia Promoting Global Warming Hysteria?

In article
<a29e439b-3f19-408b-aee3-d8cfa8d37bf4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Robert
S <roberts218e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> On 16 Jul, 02:13, =A7=A7 KR=A5K=A5T =A7=A7@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:55:30 -0700 (PDT), Robert S
> >
> >
> >
> > <roberts2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >On Jul 15, 7:51 pm, abelard <abela...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 11:44:38 -0700 (PDT), "leonard7...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
> >
> > >> <leonard7...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> > >> > Wikipedia Promoting Global Warming Hysteria?
> >
> > >> you're a double idiot my boy.....
> >
> > >> 1)to expect to trust wikipedia....
> > >> 2)as a moonbat in denial over agw.....
> >
> > >>http://www.planetark.com/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/49370/story.htm
> > >> "The US Environmental Protection Agency said on Monday that
greenhouse
> > >> gas emissions endanger human health, a critical finding that has
> > >> languished in bureaucratic limbo since last December.
> >
> > >> In a 149-page do***ent, the agency's scientists said that "warming
of
> > >> the climate system is unequivocal" and that potential health risks
> > >> include more heat waves, floods and droughts, insect outbreaks and
> > >> wildfires, along with crop failure and decline in livestock and
> > >> fisheries productivity."
> >
> > >> still keep it up and eventually you could be unique....
> > >> a bit like the last person on earth to still believe in
phlogiston...
> >
> > >Slight warming is unequivocal. The pro****tion, or lack thereof,
caused
> > >by man is very much equivocal.
> >
> > >How's the Sun doing now? We might be in for a new mini ice age.
> >
> > That would be kewel! :)
> 
> Climate is constantly changing, and has been for hundreds of millions
> of years empirically. But changing about an equilibrium point.
> 

> Yet, miraculously, the present climate is apparently nirvana, 

In fact it is, in the sense that both the biota and human cultures
are adapted to the current climate.  

> and any deviation from it will be disastrous.

And because both the biota and human cultures are 
adapted to the current climate, then deviations
do in fact have the potential to be disasterous.

If the current average global temperature were five degrees
warmer -- or cooler -- then the same arguments
would apply.

-- cary

> 
> How lucky we are to live in such a time.