Re: Wikipedia Promoting Global Warming Hysteria?

Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote: 
> Robert S <roberts218e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >On 18 Jul, 20:08, Bob LeChevalier <loj...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> To them?  In most cases, probably so.  But unless they have thrown
out
> >> our models of the universe, not to the degree that 300 year-old data
> >> from the pre-dawn of modern science.
> >
> >Pre-dawn. Galileo. Kepler. Newton.
> 
> Yep.  Galileo came up with some of the methods of modern science.  But
> it took Newton/Leibnitz to come up with the math.  Much of what Kepler
> did was tied up in astrological mysticism like the "music of the
> spheres".  Newton was heavily in the occult, alchemy, and other weird
> stuff, and actually spent more time on that than he did on real
> science. But only after the Enlightenment set in was it possible for
> modern science to develop.
> 
There is still no absolute proof of Newton's theory of gravity.  It's been

tested to the highest possible percentile, but it still remains a theory.

I suppose that means there is some doubt about gravity, therefor the
debate 
about should continue!