Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Education > Education General > Re: NY Times ta...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 4 of 17 Topic 12721 of 13165
Post > Topic >>

Re: NY Times takes a side..finally

by Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 22, 2008 at 11:42 AM

The_Carpathia <writingken@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> NYTimes asked McCain to revise his article and resubmit it.
>> Their argument for not publi****ng it its present form is valid
>
>So, we can hold all future op-ed pieces to be held to this standard?

No.  But the New York Times editors can.

>What about past ones?

Presumably the New York Times has done so.

>Can we reject or condemn all editorial pieces

If you are the editor of a publication to which such pieces are
contributed, yes.

>that do not give specific policy information in areas they
>challenged? 

That was not the standard.  The standard was that it had to have new
information.

>Can we expect Obama to tell us in the next few days how
>he will pay for his policy promises (not fully covered by his tax-the-
>rich plan, now)? 

No.

>To be fair, can we expect McCain to do the same?

No.

>What about vp picks?  Can we ban ALL editorial pieces that do not name
>names?

YOU can't ban anything.  YOU are not an editor of an internationally
respected newspaper.  (the concept of linking Kennie with anything
bearing the phrase "internationally respected" is worthy of a belly
laugh or two)>

How many editorial pieces has the NY Times published on VP picks?

>However...again ... I think Obama should be the winner, at this point
>(unless changes are made with the GOP VP pick that I do not expect),

Nobody cares what you "think".

>and I look forward to seeing a New York Times about face, in the even
>that the VP pick is Giuliani or another liberal.
 
An about face from what?

lojbab
Bob LeChevalier - artificial linguist; genealogist
lojbab@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Lojban language www.lojban.org
 




 17 Posts in Topic:
NY Times takes a side..finally
The_Carpathia <writing  2008-07-22 05:44:33 
Re: NY Times takes a side..finally
"Sid9" <sid9  2008-07-22 09:10:45 
Re: NY Times takes a side..finally
The_Carpathia <writing  2008-07-22 06:21:42 
Re: NY Times takes a side..finally
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-07-22 11:42:08 
Re: NY Times takes a side..finally
cary@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-07-22 16:03:22 
Re: NY Times takes a side..finally
"Bob" <no@[E  2008-07-22 07:53:30 
Re: NY Times takes a side..finally
John <dahlgren.john@[E  2008-07-22 07:36:14 
Re: NY Times takes a side..finally
"Dano" <jane  2008-07-22 15:31:10 
Re: NY Times takes a side..finally
"Jerry Okamura"  2008-07-30 14:08:45 
Re: NY Times takes a side..finally
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-07-22 12:15:50 
Re: NY Times takes a side..finally
"Dano" <jane  2008-07-22 15:39:55 
Re: NY Times takes a side..finally
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-07-22 17:11:05 
Re: NY Times takes a side..finally
cary@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-07-22 21:47:02 
Re: NY Times takes a side..finally
"Jerry Okamura"  2008-07-30 14:12:13 
Re: NY Times takes a side..finally
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-07-30 21:06:41 
Re: NY Times takes a side..finally
cary@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-07-22 16:10:23 
Re: NY Times takes a side..finally
jismquiff <jismquiff@[  2008-07-23 07:51:00 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Tue Oct 7 6:58:21 CDT 2008.