Re: Congressional Min Wage Failure to be Passed on to next President

On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 22:33:56 -0700 (PDT), SMACKED ASS DADDY
<pepsivanilla@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On Jul 26, 10:25 am, Patriot Games <Patr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 18:32:13 -0700 (PDT), SMACKED ASS DADDY
>> <pepsivani...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >On Jul 25, 11:57 am, Patriot Games <Patr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 12:55:19 -0400, "Larry Hewitt"
>> >> <larryh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> >Try to stay with me,. I know thinking is painful and logic eludes
you, but
>> >> >try anyway.
>> >> >Higher wages means more disposable income in the hands of
consumers.
>> >> Let's TEST that.
>> >> Joe's Subshop:
>> >> 1) 4 employees at $6/hr. = $24/hr.
>> >> 2) Minimum wage of $1/hr.
>> >> 3) 4 employees at $7/hr. = $28/hr.
>> >> 4) Joe says "Hell No!" and lets one go.
>> >> 4) 3 employees at $7/hr. = $21/hr.
>> >> Total disposable income in the hands of consumers WAS $24.
>> >> Total disposable income in the hands of consumers IS $21.
>> >> Try again, Larry.
>> >LOOKS TO ME LIKE JOE IS POCKETING 3 BUCKS PER HOUR,
>> That's why Joe is an employer and NOT an employee, like you.
>> >BUT UNABLE TO SELL
>> >AS MANY SANDWICHES DUE TO NOT ENOUGH HANDS!
>> Harder working hands means MORE sales.
>Think for a moment, damnit!  If the crew is already working as fast as
>they can they aren't going to be able to make up the difference caused
>by laying off one fifth of the crew.

One-fourth, moron.

>Quality will suffer, food will be ****ed up,
>thereby losing customers which in turn will cause them
>to lay off even more people.

Then somebody gets fired and better people are hired.