Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Education > Genealogy, General > Re: Vatican try...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 49 of 127 Topic 8491 of 8998
Post > Topic >>

Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy

by singhals <singhals@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 8, 2008 at 06:41 PM

Bruce Remick wrote:

> "Tony H." <punkyNOSP*M@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:cK2dnaQmHcr7xr_VnZ2dnUVZ_u6dnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>>
>>Bruce Remick wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>Don't followers of most every religion believe that theirs is the 
>>>>>"right" one, and that the others are either "wrong" or simply not
quite 
>>>>>as "right"? I see no disrespect in that.
>>>>
>>>>Yes and that per se is not disrespectful.  However, IMHO it does
become 
>>>>disrespectful when one religion's believer continuously persists in 
>>>>trying to convert another religion's believer...in other words, cram 
>>>>their "right" religion down one's throat.
>>>
>>>
>>>Do you really believe that's the case here?  Do you really consider the

>>>LDS' activities with regards to proxy baptisms to be "cramming their 
>>>religion down your throat"?   Would you have ever even known about it
at 
>>>all had you not become interested in genealogy?  Do you consider your 
>>>non-Mormon ancestors to have been harmed or disgraced or their personal

>>>religion defamed by these LDS' efforts?   Wouldn't a simple "Thanks,
but 
>>>no thanks" be a more reasonable attitude?
>>>
>>
>>Perhaps I should have been more precise in my answer so that you would 
>>understand.
>>
>>You asked: "Don't followers of most every religion believe that theirs
is 
>>the 'right' one, and that the others are either 'wrong' or simply not 
>>quite as 'right'?"
>>
>>I assumed you were speaking of religions in general and I replied:  "Yes

>>and that per se is not disrespectful."
>>
>>When I continued my reply about religious believers trying the "cram
their 
>>'right' religion down one's throat", I was speaking any religion that 
>>persists in such tactics.  My reply had nothing whatsoever to do with
the 
>>Mormons.  I was thinking more of the diatribes that I have been
subjected 
>>to over the years by different religious factions that are certain that
my 
>>soul is doomed to eternal damnation because I won't convert to their 
>>"right" religion.
> 
> 
> Gotcha.  I presumed you still were referring to the Mormons.  I guess
I've 
> been lucky in that I have never been proselytized by members of any
religion 
> or group in my 65+ years, other than maybe those krishnas who used to
camp 
> out at air****ts 20-30 years ago, and that was really only being badgered
for 
> money.

How did the Jehovah's miss you?!?

Cheryl
 




 127 Posts in Topic:
Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
clifto <clifto@[EMAIL   2008-05-06 09:43:08 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
carolea7@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-07 02:57:41 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"the_verminator@[EMA  2008-05-06 20:52:38 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Bruce S" <b  2008-05-06 21:13:44 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Daniel <dxmm@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-15 21:39:50 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Texas Gen" <  2008-05-15 07:35:33 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Allen <allen@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-15 09:25:44 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Henry Brownlee"  2008-05-15 21:32:40 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Texas Gen" <  2008-05-16 07:31:24 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Allen <allen@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-16 10:09:17 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Brian <drmorrisnospam@  2008-05-16 18:49:37 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Gene Y." <p  2008-05-16 20:20:51 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Brian <drmorrisnospam@  2008-05-17 18:57:32 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Gene Y." <p  2008-05-16 21:16:08 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Henry Brownlee"  2008-05-16 20:44:17 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Gene Y." <p  2008-05-16 23:41:13 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Henry Brownlee"  2008-05-17 13:40:17 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Brian <drmorrisnospam@  2008-05-17 19:01:55 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Henry Brownlee"  2008-05-17 22:07:51 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
singhals <singhals@[EM  2008-05-20 10:46:31 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Lesley Robertson&qu  2008-05-20 18:08:24 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Allen <allen@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-20 14:47:18 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Mark Fields" &  2008-05-20 19:57:23 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Henry Brownlee"  2008-05-20 19:22:40 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
singhals <singhals@[EM  2008-05-21 10:58:21 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
carolea7@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-20 02:01:37 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Texas Gen" <  2008-05-20 07:23:40 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
carolea7@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-07 05:59:13 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Charani <SGBNOSPAM@[EM  2008-05-07 09:30:51 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Lesley Robertson&qu  2008-05-07 10:51:38 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Charani <SGBNOSPAM@[EM  2008-05-11 12:59:00 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Daniel <dxmm@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-15 21:48:05 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Lesley Robertson&qu  2008-05-15 14:24:53 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Allen <allen@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-15 09:29:07 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
JJ206 <jj206@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-15 15:59:21 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Kay Robinson <Kay_Robi  2008-05-07 09:57:13 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Texas Gen" <  2008-05-07 05:10:18 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Steve Hayes <hayesmstw  2008-05-07 08:13:41 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
GeorgeD <Not@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-07 12:00:30 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Tony H." <p  2008-05-07 07:27:53 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Lesley Robertson&qu  2008-05-07 15:46:04 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Tony H." <p  2008-05-07 09:26:34 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-07 12:52:47 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Tony H." <p  2008-05-07 18:09:05 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-07 19:56:10 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Tony H." <p  2008-05-07 20:29:27 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-07 22:08:05 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Tony H." <p  2008-05-07 21:10:48 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
singhals <singhals@[EM  2008-05-08 18:41:42 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Brian <drmorrisnospam@  2008-05-08 19:30:37 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-08 20:09:07 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Lesley Robertson&qu  2008-05-08 09:28:09 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"D. Stussy" <  2008-05-07 18:53:35 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Tony H." <p  2008-05-07 20:50:42 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-07 22:51:11 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
JJ206 <jj206@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-09 00:59:03 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
singhals <singhals@[EM  2008-05-09 14:40:29 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-07 22:18:40 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"D. Stussy" <  2008-05-07 19:43:59 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-07 22:57:27 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"D. Stussy" <  2008-05-07 20:56:17 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-08 20:25:19 
As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism
"Lesley Robertson&qu  2008-05-08 09:38:06 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Hugh Watkins <hugh.wat  2008-05-08 11:14:16 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"NoSpam" <fa  2008-05-08 16:54:31 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Lesley Robertson&qu  2008-05-09 09:59:01 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"NoSpam" <fa  2008-05-09 10:35:31 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Charani <SGBNOSPAM@[EM  2008-05-11 12:48:56 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
JJ206 <jj206@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-09 00:53:33 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-09 08:56:45 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
JJ206 <jj206@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-11 00:42:47 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-11 09:30:45 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Lesley Robertson&qu  2008-05-09 18:53:11 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Charani <SGBNOSPAM@[EM  2008-05-11 13:51:31 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Hugh Watkins <hugh.wat  2008-05-11 15:53:28 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Lesley Robertson&qu  2008-05-11 17:05:01 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Graeme Wall <Graeme@[E  2008-05-15 08:36:29 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Lesley Robertson&qu  2008-05-08 09:32:15 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Graeme Wall <Graeme@[E  2008-05-14 21:20:24 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Gene Y." <p  2008-05-14 16:41:53 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Allen <allen@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-07 20:27:57 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Graeme Wall <Graeme@[E  2008-05-14 16:38:50 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-14 13:46:49 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Graeme Wall <Graeme@[E  2008-05-14 08:04:33 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-14 08:37:09 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Henry Brownlee"  2008-05-08 11:05:37 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Graeme Wall <Graeme@[E  2008-05-13 15:06:53 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Allen <allen@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-13 12:11:10 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-13 20:35:39 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Charles Ellson <charle  2008-05-14 02:04:42 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-13 22:27:10 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Charani <SGBNOSPAM@[EM  2008-05-15 08:31:56 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
clifto <clifto@[EMAIL   2008-05-07 16:26:45 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Brian <drmorrisnospam@  2008-05-07 18:52:12 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Lesley Robertson&qu  2008-05-08 09:20:38 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-08 07:53:02 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
singhals <singhals@[EM  2008-05-08 18:49:23 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
William Bojanowski <bo  2008-05-08 11:26:35 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
singhals <singhals@[EM  2008-05-08 18:51:58 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
William Bojanowski <bo  2008-05-09 12:30:19 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Graeme Wall <Graeme@[E  2008-05-13 07:50:55 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-13 08:27:25 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
JJ206 <jj206@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-13 07:10:40 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Dr. Grok" <  2008-05-07 23:52:07 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"the_verminator@[EMA  2008-05-07 18:17:45 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Graeme Wall <Graeme@[E  2008-05-11 16:15:22 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-11 12:30:21 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Graeme Wall <Graeme@[E  2008-05-11 18:10:05 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-11 20:19:28 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
carolea7@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-13 03:31:54 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
myths@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-14 05:13:20 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Mary_Gordon@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-11 15:49:56 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Lesley Robertson&qu  2008-05-12 10:10:01 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Henry Brownlee"  2008-05-13 15:30:16 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Jaqian <jaqian@[EMAIL   2008-05-12 00:59:21 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Graeme Wall <Graeme@[E  2008-05-12 09:18:47 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Hugh Watkins <hugh.wat  2008-05-12 12:02:12 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-12 08:56:31 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
singhals <singhals@[EM  2008-05-12 11:35:59 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-12 14:36:51 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Lesley Robertson&qu  2008-05-12 17:52:26 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Sir Creep <sircreep@[E  2008-05-12 05:44:57 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Sir Creep <sircreep@[E  2008-05-12 05:52:02 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Graeme Wall <Graeme@[E  2008-05-12 18:20:08 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-12 20:20:00 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Mary_Gordon@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-07 10:20:19 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
JJ206 <jj206@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-08 07:05:27 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Wed Dec 3 16:52:24 CST 2008.