Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Education > Genealogy, General > Re: As a matter...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 69 of 127 Topic 8491 of 8942
Post > Topic >>

Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism

by JJ206 <jj206@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 9, 2008 at 12:53 AM

Lesley Robertson wrote:
> Just out of idle interest, how many of the people who claim to be so 
> mortally offended by the religious activities on the LDS are actively
using 
> the IGI and the other genealogical sources provided by the LDS, despite
the 
> fact that the main reason for this enormous genealogical effort is in
order 
> that their ancestors can be retrospectively "baptized"?

Just pretend that you are in heaven sipping on a really good strawberry
smoothie on a cloud and humming a happy tune with your family and 
friends chatting about the old adventures. Then pops in a serious LDS
suit and you spill smoothie on your white clothes and he loudly 
proclaims "Hey, would you like to be baptised Mormon and move to this 
other cloud and sip these other strawberry smoothies with total
strangers ?

You wouldn't be "mortally" offended because you are already dead, but 
you might be "spiritually" offended. And the devil would laugh every 
time it happens.

Perhaps if you were in hell, and the same question was asked, then maybe 
you would be glad to jump at the chance to be baptized, but I doubt you 
could hear the message over the noise of the meat grinders and volcano 
explosions.

> And how many are aware that any 19th century ancestor can have a LOT of 
> descendants, all of whom have equal rights?

No clue what that means. Please rephrase and expand.

> Lesley Robertson

Jonathan M.
 




 127 Posts in Topic:
Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
clifto <clifto@[EMAIL   2008-05-06 09:43:08 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
carolea7@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-07 02:57:41 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"the_verminator@[EMA  2008-05-06 20:52:38 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Bruce S" <b  2008-05-06 21:13:44 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Daniel <dxmm@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-15 21:39:50 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Texas Gen" <  2008-05-15 07:35:33 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Allen <allen@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-15 09:25:44 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Henry Brownlee"  2008-05-15 21:32:40 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Texas Gen" <  2008-05-16 07:31:24 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Allen <allen@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-16 10:09:17 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Brian <drmorrisnospam@  2008-05-16 18:49:37 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Gene Y." <p  2008-05-16 20:20:51 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Brian <drmorrisnospam@  2008-05-17 18:57:32 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Gene Y." <p  2008-05-16 21:16:08 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Henry Brownlee"  2008-05-16 20:44:17 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Gene Y." <p  2008-05-16 23:41:13 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Henry Brownlee"  2008-05-17 13:40:17 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Brian <drmorrisnospam@  2008-05-17 19:01:55 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Henry Brownlee"  2008-05-17 22:07:51 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
singhals <singhals@[EM  2008-05-20 10:46:31 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Lesley Robertson&qu  2008-05-20 18:08:24 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Allen <allen@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-20 14:47:18 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Mark Fields" &  2008-05-20 19:57:23 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Henry Brownlee"  2008-05-20 19:22:40 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
singhals <singhals@[EM  2008-05-21 10:58:21 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
carolea7@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-20 02:01:37 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Texas Gen" <  2008-05-20 07:23:40 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
carolea7@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-07 05:59:13 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Charani <SGBNOSPAM@[EM  2008-05-07 09:30:51 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Lesley Robertson&qu  2008-05-07 10:51:38 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Charani <SGBNOSPAM@[EM  2008-05-11 12:59:00 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Daniel <dxmm@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-15 21:48:05 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Lesley Robertson&qu  2008-05-15 14:24:53 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Allen <allen@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-15 09:29:07 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
JJ206 <jj206@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-15 15:59:21 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Kay Robinson <Kay_Robi  2008-05-07 09:57:13 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Texas Gen" <  2008-05-07 05:10:18 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Steve Hayes <hayesmstw  2008-05-07 08:13:41 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
GeorgeD <Not@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-07 12:00:30 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Tony H." <p  2008-05-07 07:27:53 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Lesley Robertson&qu  2008-05-07 15:46:04 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Tony H." <p  2008-05-07 09:26:34 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-07 12:52:47 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Tony H." <p  2008-05-07 18:09:05 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-07 19:56:10 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Tony H." <p  2008-05-07 20:29:27 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-07 22:08:05 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Tony H." <p  2008-05-07 21:10:48 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
singhals <singhals@[EM  2008-05-08 18:41:42 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Brian <drmorrisnospam@  2008-05-08 19:30:37 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-08 20:09:07 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Lesley Robertson&qu  2008-05-08 09:28:09 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"D. Stussy" <  2008-05-07 18:53:35 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Tony H." <p  2008-05-07 20:50:42 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-07 22:51:11 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
JJ206 <jj206@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-09 00:59:03 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
singhals <singhals@[EM  2008-05-09 14:40:29 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-07 22:18:40 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"D. Stussy" <  2008-05-07 19:43:59 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-07 22:57:27 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"D. Stussy" <  2008-05-07 20:56:17 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-08 20:25:19 
As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism
"Lesley Robertson&qu  2008-05-08 09:38:06 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Hugh Watkins <hugh.wat  2008-05-08 11:14:16 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"NoSpam" <fa  2008-05-08 16:54:31 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Lesley Robertson&qu  2008-05-09 09:59:01 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"NoSpam" <fa  2008-05-09 10:35:31 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Charani <SGBNOSPAM@[EM  2008-05-11 12:48:56 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
JJ206 <jj206@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-09 00:53:33 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-09 08:56:45 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
JJ206 <jj206@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-11 00:42:47 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-11 09:30:45 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Lesley Robertson&qu  2008-05-09 18:53:11 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Charani <SGBNOSPAM@[EM  2008-05-11 13:51:31 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Hugh Watkins <hugh.wat  2008-05-11 15:53:28 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Lesley Robertson&qu  2008-05-11 17:05:01 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Graeme Wall <Graeme@[E  2008-05-15 08:36:29 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Lesley Robertson&qu  2008-05-08 09:32:15 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Graeme Wall <Graeme@[E  2008-05-14 21:20:24 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Gene Y." <p  2008-05-14 16:41:53 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Allen <allen@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-07 20:27:57 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Graeme Wall <Graeme@[E  2008-05-14 16:38:50 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-14 13:46:49 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Graeme Wall <Graeme@[E  2008-05-14 08:04:33 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-14 08:37:09 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Henry Brownlee"  2008-05-08 11:05:37 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Graeme Wall <Graeme@[E  2008-05-13 15:06:53 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Allen <allen@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-13 12:11:10 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-13 20:35:39 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Charles Ellson <charle  2008-05-14 02:04:42 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-13 22:27:10 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Charani <SGBNOSPAM@[EM  2008-05-15 08:31:56 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
clifto <clifto@[EMAIL   2008-05-07 16:26:45 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Brian <drmorrisnospam@  2008-05-07 18:52:12 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Lesley Robertson&qu  2008-05-08 09:20:38 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-08 07:53:02 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
singhals <singhals@[EM  2008-05-08 18:49:23 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
William Bojanowski <bo  2008-05-08 11:26:35 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
singhals <singhals@[EM  2008-05-08 18:51:58 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
William Bojanowski <bo  2008-05-09 12:30:19 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Graeme Wall <Graeme@[E  2008-05-13 07:50:55 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-13 08:27:25 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
JJ206 <jj206@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-13 07:10:40 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Dr. Grok" <  2008-05-07 23:52:07 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"the_verminator@[EMA  2008-05-07 18:17:45 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Graeme Wall <Graeme@[E  2008-05-11 16:15:22 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-11 12:30:21 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Graeme Wall <Graeme@[E  2008-05-11 18:10:05 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-11 20:19:28 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
carolea7@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-13 03:31:54 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
myths@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-14 05:13:20 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Mary_Gordon@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-11 15:49:56 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Lesley Robertson&qu  2008-05-12 10:10:01 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Henry Brownlee"  2008-05-13 15:30:16 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Jaqian <jaqian@[EMAIL   2008-05-12 00:59:21 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Graeme Wall <Graeme@[E  2008-05-12 09:18:47 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Hugh Watkins <hugh.wat  2008-05-12 12:02:12 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-12 08:56:31 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
singhals <singhals@[EM  2008-05-12 11:35:59 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-12 14:36:51 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Lesley Robertson&qu  2008-05-12 17:52:26 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Sir Creep <sircreep@[E  2008-05-12 05:44:57 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Sir Creep <sircreep@[E  2008-05-12 05:52:02 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Graeme Wall <Graeme@[E  2008-05-12 18:20:08 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-12 20:20:00 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Mary_Gordon@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-07 10:20:19 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
JJ206 <jj206@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-08 07:05:27 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Nov 22 10:36:04 CST 2008.