Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Education > Genealogy, General > Re: As a matter...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 70 of 127 Topic 8491 of 8942
Post > Topic >>

Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy)

by "Bruce Remick" <remick@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 9, 2008 at 08:56 AM

"JJ206" <jj206@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:1210319375.517770@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Lesley Robertson wrote:
>> Just out of idle interest, how many of the people who claim to be so 
>> mortally offended by the religious activities on the LDS are actively 
>> using the IGI and the other genealogical sources provided by the LDS, 
>> despite the fact that the main reason for this enormous genealogical 
>> effort is in order that their ancestors can be retrospectively 
>> "baptized"?
>
> Just pretend that you are in heaven sipping on a really good strawberry
> smoothie on a cloud and humming a happy tune with your family and
friends 
> chatting about the old adventures. Then pops in a serious LDS
> suit and you spill smoothie on your white clothes and he loudly
proclaims 
> "Hey, would you like to be baptised Mormon and move to this other cloud 
> and sip these other strawberry smoothies with total
> strangers ?
>
> You wouldn't be "mortally" offended because you are already dead, but
you 
> might be "spiritually" offended. And the devil would laugh every time it

> happens.
>
> Perhaps if you were in hell, and the same question was asked, then maybe

> you would be glad to jump at the chance to be baptized, but I doubt you 
> could hear the message over the noise of the meat grinders and volcano 
> explosions.

You sound like you believe that your long-dead ancestors will actually 
"feel" their names being recorded or "baptized" by the LDS researchers,
and 
might be offended by it.  And that those ancestors will forever more be 
considered Mormon by posterity.
 




 127 Posts in Topic:
Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
clifto <clifto@[EMAIL   2008-05-06 09:43:08 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
carolea7@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-07 02:57:41 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"the_verminator@[EMA  2008-05-06 20:52:38 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Bruce S" <b  2008-05-06 21:13:44 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Daniel <dxmm@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-15 21:39:50 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Texas Gen" <  2008-05-15 07:35:33 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Allen <allen@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-15 09:25:44 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Henry Brownlee"  2008-05-15 21:32:40 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Texas Gen" <  2008-05-16 07:31:24 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Allen <allen@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-16 10:09:17 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Brian <drmorrisnospam@  2008-05-16 18:49:37 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Gene Y." <p  2008-05-16 20:20:51 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Brian <drmorrisnospam@  2008-05-17 18:57:32 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Gene Y." <p  2008-05-16 21:16:08 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Henry Brownlee"  2008-05-16 20:44:17 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Gene Y." <p  2008-05-16 23:41:13 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Henry Brownlee"  2008-05-17 13:40:17 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Brian <drmorrisnospam@  2008-05-17 19:01:55 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Henry Brownlee"  2008-05-17 22:07:51 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
singhals <singhals@[EM  2008-05-20 10:46:31 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Lesley Robertson&qu  2008-05-20 18:08:24 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Allen <allen@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-20 14:47:18 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Mark Fields" &  2008-05-20 19:57:23 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Henry Brownlee"  2008-05-20 19:22:40 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
singhals <singhals@[EM  2008-05-21 10:58:21 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
carolea7@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-20 02:01:37 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Texas Gen" <  2008-05-20 07:23:40 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
carolea7@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-07 05:59:13 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Charani <SGBNOSPAM@[EM  2008-05-07 09:30:51 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Lesley Robertson&qu  2008-05-07 10:51:38 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Charani <SGBNOSPAM@[EM  2008-05-11 12:59:00 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Daniel <dxmm@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-15 21:48:05 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Lesley Robertson&qu  2008-05-15 14:24:53 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Allen <allen@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-15 09:29:07 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
JJ206 <jj206@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-15 15:59:21 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Kay Robinson <Kay_Robi  2008-05-07 09:57:13 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Texas Gen" <  2008-05-07 05:10:18 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Steve Hayes <hayesmstw  2008-05-07 08:13:41 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
GeorgeD <Not@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-07 12:00:30 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Tony H." <p  2008-05-07 07:27:53 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Lesley Robertson&qu  2008-05-07 15:46:04 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Tony H." <p  2008-05-07 09:26:34 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-07 12:52:47 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Tony H." <p  2008-05-07 18:09:05 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-07 19:56:10 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Tony H." <p  2008-05-07 20:29:27 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-07 22:08:05 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Tony H." <p  2008-05-07 21:10:48 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
singhals <singhals@[EM  2008-05-08 18:41:42 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Brian <drmorrisnospam@  2008-05-08 19:30:37 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-08 20:09:07 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Lesley Robertson&qu  2008-05-08 09:28:09 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"D. Stussy" <  2008-05-07 18:53:35 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Tony H." <p  2008-05-07 20:50:42 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-07 22:51:11 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
JJ206 <jj206@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-09 00:59:03 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
singhals <singhals@[EM  2008-05-09 14:40:29 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-07 22:18:40 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"D. Stussy" <  2008-05-07 19:43:59 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-07 22:57:27 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"D. Stussy" <  2008-05-07 20:56:17 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-08 20:25:19 
As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism
"Lesley Robertson&qu  2008-05-08 09:38:06 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Hugh Watkins <hugh.wat  2008-05-08 11:14:16 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"NoSpam" <fa  2008-05-08 16:54:31 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Lesley Robertson&qu  2008-05-09 09:59:01 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"NoSpam" <fa  2008-05-09 10:35:31 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Charani <SGBNOSPAM@[EM  2008-05-11 12:48:56 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
JJ206 <jj206@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-09 00:53:33 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-09 08:56:45 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
JJ206 <jj206@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-11 00:42:47 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-11 09:30:45 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Lesley Robertson&qu  2008-05-09 18:53:11 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Charani <SGBNOSPAM@[EM  2008-05-11 13:51:31 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Hugh Watkins <hugh.wat  2008-05-11 15:53:28 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Lesley Robertson&qu  2008-05-11 17:05:01 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Graeme Wall <Graeme@[E  2008-05-15 08:36:29 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Lesley Robertson&qu  2008-05-08 09:32:15 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Graeme Wall <Graeme@[E  2008-05-14 21:20:24 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Gene Y." <p  2008-05-14 16:41:53 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Allen <allen@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-07 20:27:57 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Graeme Wall <Graeme@[E  2008-05-14 16:38:50 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-14 13:46:49 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Graeme Wall <Graeme@[E  2008-05-14 08:04:33 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-14 08:37:09 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Henry Brownlee"  2008-05-08 11:05:37 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Graeme Wall <Graeme@[E  2008-05-13 15:06:53 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Allen <allen@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-13 12:11:10 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-13 20:35:39 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Charles Ellson <charle  2008-05-14 02:04:42 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-13 22:27:10 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Charani <SGBNOSPAM@[EM  2008-05-15 08:31:56 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
clifto <clifto@[EMAIL   2008-05-07 16:26:45 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Brian <drmorrisnospam@  2008-05-07 18:52:12 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Lesley Robertson&qu  2008-05-08 09:20:38 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-08 07:53:02 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
singhals <singhals@[EM  2008-05-08 18:49:23 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
William Bojanowski <bo  2008-05-08 11:26:35 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
singhals <singhals@[EM  2008-05-08 18:51:58 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
William Bojanowski <bo  2008-05-09 12:30:19 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Graeme Wall <Graeme@[E  2008-05-13 07:50:55 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-13 08:27:25 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
JJ206 <jj206@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-13 07:10:40 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"Dr. Grok" <  2008-05-07 23:52:07 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
"the_verminator@[EMA  2008-05-07 18:17:45 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Graeme Wall <Graeme@[E  2008-05-11 16:15:22 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-11 12:30:21 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Graeme Wall <Graeme@[E  2008-05-11 18:10:05 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-11 20:19:28 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
carolea7@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-13 03:31:54 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
myths@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-14 05:13:20 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Mary_Gordon@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-11 15:49:56 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Lesley Robertson&qu  2008-05-12 10:10:01 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Henry Brownlee"  2008-05-13 15:30:16 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Jaqian <jaqian@[EMAIL   2008-05-12 00:59:21 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Graeme Wall <Graeme@[E  2008-05-12 09:18:47 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Hugh Watkins <hugh.wat  2008-05-12 12:02:12 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-12 08:56:31 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
singhals <singhals@[EM  2008-05-12 11:35:59 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-12 14:36:51 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Lesley Robertson&qu  2008-05-12 17:52:26 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Sir Creep <sircreep@[E  2008-05-12 05:44:57 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Sir Creep <sircreep@[E  2008-05-12 05:52:02 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
Graeme Wall <Graeme@[E  2008-05-12 18:20:08 
Re: As a matter of interest (was Re: Vatican trying to avoid bap
"Bruce Remick"   2008-05-12 20:20:00 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
Mary_Gordon@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-07 10:20:19 
Re: Vatican trying to avoid baptism by proxy
JJ206 <jj206@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-08 07:05:27 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Nov 22 10:53:43 CST 2008.