Re: EVOLUTION CHOKES ON ITS OWN BULL****

Tooned In wrote:
> "Fred Kasner" <fkasner@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:2BmYj.9167$nl7.8293@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Tooned In wrote:
>>> Remember guys,
>>> **NOBODY is born religious. It's an acquired disease**
>>>
>>>
>>> I LOVE IT - THANKS !!!
>>>
>>>
>> On the contrary! The newborn cannot verbalize it but its mind sees as
the 
>> provider of comfort, warmth, and food and liquid as God incarnate.
However 
>> since there is nothing else in its post natal universe but that
provider 
>> there need not even be such a creature as God. The provider is God.
What 
>> follows sequentially either enforces, reinforces, or denies the
existence 
>> of such a universal provider.
>> FK
> 
> Such a "faithful interpretative leap" you made there!
> 
> What you describe are instinctive survival mechanisms,
> and not factually proven to be some divine guidance.
> 
> A baby jangaroo crawls from the womb to the teet in it's mothers pouch.
> 
> Does a Lion feel remorse when it kills to survive,
> do grasshoppers make grocery lists?
> 
> Oh pahleeeaaassseee. 
> 
> 

Another one who can't read. I never once claimed that there was an 
example of divine guidance involved in this infantile response at all. 
The approximate omniscience and omnipotence of the initial caretaker 
(usually the birth mother) is what can foster the notion that such an 
omnipotence and omniscience exists. Nothing divine in the character of 
these infantile responses that take a long time to grow out of it ever 
at all.
FK