Re: EVOLUTION CHOKES ON ITS OWN BULL****

"Fred Kasner" <fkasner@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:xGF_j.3536$Ri.1704@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Johnny wrote:
>> "Fred Kasner" <fkasner@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>> news:v8m_j.1364$uE5.1140@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Tooned In wrote:
>>>> "Fred Kasner" <fkasner@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>>>> news:2BmYj.9167$nl7.8293@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> Tooned In wrote:
>>>>>> Remember guys,
>>>>>> **NOBODY is born religious. It's an acquired disease**
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I LOVE IT - THANKS !!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> On the contrary! The newborn cannot verbalize it but its mind sees
as 
>>>>> the provider of comfort, warmth, and food and liquid as God
incarnate. 
>>>>> However since there is nothing else in its post natal universe but 
>>>>> that provider there need not even be such a creature as God. The 
>>>>> provider is God. What follows sequentially either enforces, 
>>>>> reinforces, or denies the existence of such a universal provider.
>>>>> FK
>>>> Such a "faithful interpretative leap" you made there!
>>>>
>>>> What you describe are instinctive survival mechanisms,
>>>> and not factually proven to be some divine guidance.
>>>>
>>>> A baby jangaroo crawls from the womb to the teet in it's mothers
pouch.
>>>>
>>>> Does a Lion feel remorse when it kills to survive,
>>>> do grasshoppers make grocery lists?
>>>>
>>>> Oh pahleeeaaassseee.
>>> Another one who can't read. I never once claimed that there was an 
>>> example of divine guidance involved in this infantile response at all.

>>> The approximate omniscience and omnipotence of the initial caretaker 
>>> (usually the birth mother) is what can foster the notion that such an 
>>> omnipotence and omniscience exists. Nothing divine in the character of

>>> these infantile responses that take a long time to grow out of it ever

>>> at all.
>>> FK
>>
>> What you are failing to understand, is nobody gives a **** about what
you 
>> meant...
>
> No, it is just you that nobody cares about. Difficult to live with that,

> isn't it?
> FK

Projecting is very unbecoming.  Please consult your local lotobomist!