Re: Lojban

On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 00:27:47 -0400, Bob LeChevalier
<lojbab@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>Padraic Brown <elemtilas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>That will depend on what you mean by it - the context is insufficient
>>>to identify the intended meaning.
>>
>>I take it you don't listen to AM radio. The context is the top of the
>>hour moment when the radio station jingle announces "WXYZ, 1551AM,
>>with your news, s****ts and weather at the top of the hour!"
>
>The statement is multiply ambiguous and false to boot (it's marketing,
>so we should expect this).  There will in fact be no s****ts at the top
>of the hour.  For one thing, hours are not physical objects and have
>no "tops".  

Rest snipped for brevity. If you choose not to answer the question,
kindly say so! I can only take this to mean that "s****ts" is something
that can't be discussed in Lojban and that Lojban is not a language
that could ever be used for daily life.

Padraic

-- 
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com