In article <07u914tno6sbq0aj23hsaonq9c1k3357b1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Padraic Brown
<elemtilas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Kerno was largely done in my head (overall shape, syntax, sound
> changes, stuff like that; charts of paradigms were largely done on
> paper), though if I didn't write it down, it would have been
> forgotten!
Do you think it would be possible to do it all in one's head? Assuming
that one has an intense desire to do so. I wonder if a conlang created
in that way would be especially, erm, special in some way -- especially
customized to the inner workings of the creator's brain.
|
