hie,
this iz a.b.normal. (iem uezing this nue aelias and e-mael adres
nou.) az ie hav sed befoe'r, it iz mie opi'nyon that huej benefits
wuhd rezu'lt from a komprehe'nsiv inglish speling refoe'rm. pozitiv
refoe'rmz need not taek the az radikal an aproe'ch az the sistem ie am
uezing hear. anee refoe'rm at ahl toward pozitiv chaenj wuhd bee a
dezie'rabul thing. wun ov the problemz ie see with the wae the
evoloo'shunaeree refoe'rmz that hav ben implemented in the past iz
that thae hav ben implemented in a rathur hapha'zard manur. a guhd
jeneral dire'kshun foer the fuetuer ov inglish speling wuhd bee too
moov riten and spoeken inglish kloesur too konsi'stensee with wun
anothur. wuhdunt that maek the moest sens? eduekashunal
polisee-maeking groops and publishurz shuhd konsidur this and publish
giedlienz that wuhd moov our speling in a direkshun that maeks sens
boeth foer kurent reederz and foer fuetuer lurnurz ov the langwaj.
--tw
