Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Education > Language English Spelling Reform > Why _spelling_ ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 66 of 146
Post > Topic >>

Why _spelling_ reform? Why not _pronunciation_ reform?

by theldor@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9?=) Nov 24, 2004 at 03:28 AM

I have found a lot of writings about spelling reforms of the English
language. But, as far as I know, is the English _writing_ (either
British or American) what joins the world: non-english speakers often
use their mother tongue rules to pronounce the English words they
learn. Why not change the pronunciation of English to be more
predictable?

  We could assign a unique phonem to each letter, so that
pronunciation would no longer be ambiguous.

  For instance, we could use the latin vowels:
    a: like uh
    e: like the e in pen.
    i: like ee
    o: like aw
    u: like oo

  In the example, "join" would be pronounced as jaw-in.

  Pros: No need to rewrite old texts. Also convenient for computer
languages and sources, which couldn't "update" to the new ortography.

  Cons: Pronunciation is volatile. Spoken do***ents are less common
than written do***ents, but speaking is more frecuently used than
writing. People cannot immediately switch their pronunciation, so it
should be done in stages. Also, if pronunciation is based on
ortography, the British/American differences had better be solved.
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
Why _spelling_ reform? Why not _pronunciation_ reform?
theldor@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-11-24 03:28:04 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Wed Jul 23 16:10:01 CDT 2008.