Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Education > Language English Spelling Reform > Re: English 2.0...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 3 of 3 Topic 100 of 148
Post > Topic >>

Re: English 2.0 (EarthLing) skypecast

by heron stone <heronDO@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 2, 2006 at 07:41 PM

> > The interpreter of a sign is an organism;  the interpretant is the
habit 
> > of the organism to respond, because of the sign vehicle, to absent 
> > objects which are relevant to a present problematic situation as if
they 
> > were present.  In virtue of semiosis an organism takes account of 
> > relevant properties of absent objects, or unobserved properties of 
> > objects which are present, and in this lies the general instrumental 
> > significance of ideas.  Given the sign vehicle as an object of
response, 
> > the organism expects a situation of such and such a kind and, on the 
> > basis of this expectation, can partially prepare itself in advance for

> > what may develop.  The response to things through the intermediacy of 
> > signs is thus biologically a continuation of the same process in which

> > the distance senses have taken precedence over the contact senses in
the 
> > control of conduct in higher animal forms; such animals through sight,

> > hearing, and smell are already responding to distant parts of the 
> > environment through certain properties of objects functioning as signs

> > for other properties.  This process of taking account of a constantly 
> > more remote environment is simply continued in the complex process of 
> > semiosis made possible by language, the object taken account of no 
> > longer needing to be perceptually present.
> >    - Charles Morris 
> > 
> 
> What about when the perosn talking to you is lying about the object they

> say they perceive but which is not present to them either?
> 
> Then we have false perception at a distance.
> 
> Which raises the question, how can we be sure our own perception is 
> true? 

..we can't be absolutely sure of anything... 
     in the domain of language
..luckily we don't need to be sure
..we have our perception
..we have our theories
..we go on...   together

>Is what we see really there? Is there anything there we can't see?

..a good question... but deformed by being formulated in wild enlish
..try asking it in English 2.0

> How do you know?

?how do i know what

unDO email address
___
Nature,                                                 heron stone
  to be commanded,                                http://gendo.net
         must be obeyed.                 mailto:heronDO@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 




 3 Posts in Topic:
English 2.0 (EarthLing) skypecast
heron stone <heronDO@[  2006-06-02 00:26:39 
Re: English 2.0 (EarthLing) skypecast
Stephen Calder <calder  2006-06-02 17:57:41 
Re: English 2.0 (EarthLing) skypecast
heron stone <heronDO@[  2006-06-02 19:41:31 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Dec 4 19:41:36 CST 2008.