"hab****" <hi@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:44d4aa94.17543828@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 06:28:41 -0700, "Seeker"
> <4not_listed_due_to_spam_bots_121101@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Dont be silly . Farsi and Sanskrit are Aryan languages and are
> related .
Absolutely, the two are related. But that's not what he said. He said that
Farsi is derived from Sanskrit, and that conveys the ideals of Hindu
nationalism along with ethnocentricity and a false sense of superiority.
Arabic is a semitic language and has completely different
> words and grammar. Farsi and Sanskrit are thousands of years old.
Yes, but Arabic is also thousands of years old. So what?
> Arabic came with Muslim invasions from 670AD onwards.
> Of course you are in denial . Everybody knows Urdu is derived
> from Hindi which in turn is from Sanskrit .
No, Urdu was the language that was spoken in India as a result of various
languages coming together. True, that Sanskrit plays a big influence on
Urdu, but Hindi was a made up language by the Hindu nationalists.
Essentially, Hindi is Urdu with Arabic and Farsi words replaced with
Sanskrit words.So as you can see technically Hindi is derived from Urdu.
|
