Re: "ad maiorem hominem gloriam"

"Ed Cryer" <ed@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:fslum5$ala$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Nicole McDonald" <askme@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:3oidnZ5G0JOgHXDanZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> "Ed Cryer" <ed@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>> news:fsjem1$rhp$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>> "Prisoner at War" <prisoner_at_war@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>>>
news:233e5d63-12d9-468b-9204-cedc89c3c9f4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> On Mar 28, 3:46 am, "Caligula" <caius.calig...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Prisoner at War a crit :
>>>>
>>>> > Is "ad maiorem hominem gloriam" correct?  (It's a humanist/atheist
>>>> > play on the Jesuit motto.)
>>>>
>>>> Non, ce n'est pas correct. On attendrait : ad maiorem hominum/hominis
>>>> gloriam.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Caligula
>>>
>>>
>>> Ave, Caesar!
>>>
>>> Qu'est-ce que c'est, "hominum/hominis" -- singulier et pluriel?
>>>
>>> *****
>>>
>>> Ca ne vaut rien en francais. Singulier ou pluriel.
>>> Sic erat etiam Latine.
>>>
>>> Varium et semper mutabile femina. (Vergil)
>>> Lequel veut dire; feminae sunt mutabiles.
>>>
>>> Sic cantavit Verdi; la donna e mobile.
>>>
>>> Ainsi que ca ne vaut rien en italien aussi.
>>>
>>> To the greater glory of man; to the greater glory of men; to the
greater 
>>> glory of mankind.
>>>
>>> But there is only one God.
>> ... ???? ?????? ???? ?????? ???? ???
>>
>>
>> ????? ???? ??? ??? ???? ??? ????? ??????? ?????? ????? ??? ????????
>>
>>>
>>> Ed
>>>
>>
>>
>
> An attempt to cross linguistic and cultural barriers. If it failed then 
> pardon my sense of humour.
> Do you like the poetry of Vergil? And the music of Verdi?
>
> Ed
>
Sometimes the unicode works for me. I was trying to write in Hebrew
letters 
but I may have used the wrong standard.
Vergil was one of the best classical poets and Verdi was an excellent 
composer.

It was basically: SHEMA YISRAEL ADONAI ELOHENU ADONAI ECHAD(.)