by "Ed Cryer" <ed@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Apr 22, 2008 at 07:11 PM
"John W Kennedy" <jwkenne@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:480e2929$0$15173$607ed4bc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> John W Kennedy wrote:
>> Would this be correct?
>>
>> Libri foetidi scaenici non indigemus.
>>
>> Can it be improved? Is "liber scaenicus" right to begin with? My
>> dictionary offers nothing. Perhaps "libellus scaenicus" would be
>> better? I'm trying to avoid either "comoedus" and "tragicus".
>
> Arrggghhhh! That's "Libros foetidos scaenicos", of course. I'm not
> normally that idiotic, but finding the idiom had me spinning my wheels
> so much that I completely forgot first-week grammar.
>
>
3rd-week grammar might have informed you that not all verbs take the
accusative case.
Ed
