The manner in which we speak (and think when
thinking in words - which we do in word dominated
consciousness) actually vibronically conditions the
structure of our nervous systems and accordingly our
perception of the world.
What you observe with your sensory apparatus is not
the 'actual' or 'out there', but a reality filtered by the
conditioning of your nervous system. Accordingly,
similar conditiong processes (biological, cultural and
especially linguistic) will give rise to similar, or consensus,
realities - and the greater the similarity and intensity of
conditioning, the greater the consensus.
Our collective conditioned patterns - and their interaction
with other patterned forms in 'what is' - give rise to our
view of the world; so long as we persist in those patterns,
so long will that view persist. On the other hand, ****fting
our cultural and linguistic patterns will ****ft our view of
the world (which - owing to the arrival of acrophonic
alphabets, the printed word, standardised dictionaries,
mass production, the workings of electronic mass media,
the hegonomy of Western culture, the electronic computer
and concordant languages - rapidly converges on a global scale).
How do we go about this without extending our present
fixated views into the new?
(I have some views on this myself, but show me yours first...)
|
