Recurrence
"Robert" <robert@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:627ff765.0404110120.7450c15f@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Dan Scorpio" <Dan.Scorpio@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:<c5687p$opa$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...
>
> So Dan,
>
> if you post more than once on the same thread is that a pattern then?
>
> How would we know that the posts you write is a pattern and not just
single posts?
>
> /Robert
> A new face in NLP.
>
>
> > "Dan Scorpio" <Dan.Scorpio@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > news:c5621s$rbf$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > "Robert" <robert@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > > news:627ff765.0404090136.66339222@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > The fundamentals are:
> > > > > 1) condtioning exists in patterns
> > > > > 2) patterns can only exist (and take hold) in/by repetition
> > > >
> > > > Could you give a more indepth of number 2 explanation?
> > > >
> > > > > hduiejgdfkhj = a random sequence
> > > > > hduiejgdfkhjhduiejgdfkhjhduiejgdfkhj = a pattern
> > >
> > >
> > > The folowing sequence of letters (which can represent
> > > events of any kind) I have 'randomly' taped out on my
> > > keyboard:
> > >
> > Whoops! (I inadvertently cut & pasted the string rather than
copied...)
> > This is what it should have looked like:
> >
> > kljhgcvrlgyvfoligoiwghuwuighpuihvpibhtygfoeyuhfpug
> >
> > >
> > > To all intents and purposes that sequence is 'chaotic' or random,
> > > and could continue indefinitely as a random string. (practically,
> > > there may be a tiny bit of pattern there owing to the structure of
my
> > > hands and the keyboard - it would be better with a table of random
> > > numbers but the sequence of letters is good enough for the point
> > > in hand).
> > >
> > > Randomness, by definition, has no structure. To have a pattern you
> > > must have structure - and to have structure you must have
repetition.
> > > Accordingly, although the previous string was random, if I repeat it
> > > thus:
> > >
> > > kljhgcvrlgyvfoligoiwghuwuighpuihvpibhtygfoeyuhfpug
> > > kljhgcvrlgyvfoligoiwghuwuighpuihvpibhtygfoeyuhfpug
> > > kljhgcvrlgyvfoligoiwghuwuighpuihvpibhtygfoeyuhfpug
> > > kljhgcvrlgyvfoligoiwghuwuighpuihvpibhtygfoeyuhfpug
> > >
> > > I now have a pattern.
> > > Pattern comes into being by repetition.
> > >
> > >
> > > > > Patterns exist as periodic oscillations, sometimes
> > > > > simple, sometimes complex, but even the most complex
> > > > > of oscillations can be broken into simple component parts.
> > > > >
> > > > > That's all you need to know to begin with - the rest
> > > > > falls in place as you apply it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Once you become aware of the fundamentals - by
> > > > > daily/moment to moment observation, not by mere intellectual
> > > > > discussion and theorisation - then you should be able
> > > > > to detect patterns in most things & in many cases deal
> > > > > with them as necessary 'on the wing'. Alternatively,
> > > > > you may use prescribed (usually tried and tested) 'technique'
> > > > > as devised by others. The first method is best in terms
> > > > > of actual in depth understanding; as for the second method,
> > > > > well note that somewhere, sometime, somebody (usually
> > > > > Milton Erickson!) originally devised that technique.
> > > >
> > > > The above all makes sense in the NLP world.
> > > >
> > > > There is more to that since if it was as easy to detect patterns
more
> > > > would be able to do so after taking an NLP class.
> > > >
> > > > /Robert
> > > > A new face in NLP.
> > > > www.svensknlp.nu
> > >
> > >
|
