Le Sat, 09 Oct 2004 00:40:15 GMT, "bethalan" <bethalan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
écrivit :
Thanks for this answer. As soon as I have time, I will further
investigate the problem by studying the IV form of other verbs having
the same root pattern (consonnant + waw + consonnant).
Raymond
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
>------=_NextPart_000_0308_01C4AD5D.CE903EA0
>Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>So far, I've been unable to find a reference to [ajwada]; the existence =
>of a Form IV [ajwada] would make theoretical sense if there existed a =
>Form I [jawada], but this I can also find no reference to. Of course, I
=
>could be wrong . . . and then again, perhaps Bescherelle could be wrong.
=
> Bescherelle's forte has been French grammar and I suppose their work on
=
>Arabic grammar could be flawed . . . ??
> "Raymond Roy" <belamiNoSpam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message =
>news:41615076.2889880@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Are there Arabic verbs that have more than one form for a given Form?
>
> Let's consider the verb 'j=E2da' (to be or become good). Could Form IV
=
>be
> 'ajwada' as well as 'aj=E2da' ?
>
> According to my Bescherelle, both form exist. If only one of them
> correspond to Form IV of 'j=E2da', which form is the other one?
>
> Shukran.
>
> Raymond
>
>------=_NextPart_000_0308_01C4AD5D.CE903EA0
>Content-Type: text/html;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
><HTML><HEAD>
><META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
>charset=3Diso-8859-1">
><META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1458" name=3DGENERATOR>
><STYLE></STYLE>
></HEAD>
><BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
><DIV><FONT face=3DGeorgia>So far, I've been unable to find a reference =
>to=20
>[ajwada]; the existence of a Form IV [ajwada] would make theoretical =
>sense if=20
>there existed a Form I [jawada], but this I can also find no reference =
>to. =20
>Of course, I could be wrong . . . and then again, perhaps =
>Bescherelle could=20
>be wrong. Bescherelle's forte has been French grammar and I =
>suppose their=20
>work on Arabic grammar <EM>could</EM> be flawed . . . ??</FONT></DIV>
><BLOCKQUOTE=20
>style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
>BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
> <DIV>"Raymond Roy" <<A=20
> =
>href=3D"mailto:belamiNoSpam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">belamiNoSpam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>&g=
>t;=20
> wrote in message <A=20
> =
>href=3D"news:41615076.2889880@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">news:41615076.2889880@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>ews1.sympatico.ca</A>...</DIV>Are=20
> there Arabic verbs that have more than one form for a given =
>Form?<BR><BR>Let's=20
> consider the verb 'j=E2da' (to be or become good). Could Form IV =
>be<BR>'ajwada'=20
> as well as 'aj=E2da' ?<BR><BR>According to my Bescherelle, both form =
>exist. If=20
> only one of them<BR>correspond to Form IV of 'j=E2da', which form is =
>the other=20
> one?<BR><BR>Shukran.<BR><BR>Raymond<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
>
>------=_NextPart_000_0308_01C4AD5D.CE903EA0--
>
|
