This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C4AEBB.10557590
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks --- To satisfy my curiosity, what references (besides =
Bescherelle) attest to the existence of [ajwada], and how would it =
differ in meaning from [ajaada]? (to satisfy my curiosity further, what =
does "AFAIK" mean?) Thank you for your reply.
"Yusuf B Gursey" <ybg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message =
news:222ae656.0410100836.2c712a64@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"bethalan" <bethalan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message =
news:<PrG9d.6785$2u1.6143@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...
> So far, I've been unable to find a reference to [ajwada]; the =
existence=20
> of a Form IV [ajwada] would make theoretical sense if there existed =
a=20
> Form I [jawada], but this I can also find no reference to. Of =
course, I=20
AFAIK existance of form I *jawada is not a neccessary conditon. both
forms may exist and they might have slightly different meanings.
> could be wrong . . . and then again, perhaps Bescherelle could be =
wrong.=20
> Bescherelle's forte has been French grammar and I suppose their =
work on=20
> Arabic grammar could be flawed . . . ??
> "Raymond Roy" <belamiNoSpam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message=20
> news:41615076.2889880@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Are there Arabic verbs that have more than one form for a given =
Form?
>=20
> Let's consider the verb 'j da' (to be or become good). Could Form =
IV=20
> be
> 'ajwada' as well as 'aj da' ?
>=20
> According to my Bescherelle, both form exist. If only one of them
> correspond to Form IV of 'j da', which form is the other one?
>=20
> Shukran.
>=20
> Raymond
>=20
> --
------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C4AEBB.10557590
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1458" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DGeorgia>Thanks --- To satisfy my curiosity, what =
references=20
(besides Bescherelle) attest to the existence of [ajwada], and how would =
it=20
differ in meaning from [ajaada]? (to satisfy my curiosity further, =
what=20
does "AFAIK" mean?) Thank you for your reply.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>"Yusuf B Gursey" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:ybg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">ybg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> wrote in =
message <A=20
href=3D"news:222ae656.0410100836.2c712a64@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">news:222ae6=
56.0410100836.2c712a64@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">"bethalan"=20
<<A =
href=3D"mailto:bethalan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">bethalan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> wrote=20
in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:<PrG9d.6785$2u1.6143@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">news:<Pr=
G9d.6785$2u1.6143@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>...<BR>>=20
So far, I've been unable to find a reference to [ajwada]; the =
existence=20
<BR>> of a Form IV [ajwada] would make theoretical sense if there =
existed a=20
<BR>> Form I [jawada], but this I can also find no reference =
to. Of=20
course, I <BR><BR>AFAIK existance of form I *jawada is not a =
neccessary=20
conditon. both<BR>forms may exist and they might have slightly =
different=20
meanings.<BR><BR><BR>> could be wrong . . . and then again, perhaps =
Bescherelle could be wrong. <BR>> Bescherelle's forte has =
been French=20
grammar and I suppose their work on <BR>> Arabic grammar could be =
flawed .=20
. . ??<BR>> "Raymond Roy" <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:belamiNoSpam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">belamiNoSpam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>&g=
t;=20
wrote in message <BR>> <A=20
=
href=3D"news:41615076.2889880@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">news:41615076.2889880@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...<BR>> =20
Are there Arabic verbs that have more than one form for a given =
Form?<BR>>=20
<BR>> Let's consider the verb 'j da' (to be or become =
good).=20
Could Form IV <BR>> be<BR>> 'ajwada' as well as 'aj =
da'=20
?<BR>> <BR>> According to my Bescherelle, both form =
exist.=20
If only one of them<BR>> correspond to Form IV of 'j =
da', which=20
form is the other one?<BR>> <BR>> Shukran.<BR>>=20
<BR>> Raymond<BR>> <BR>> =
--</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C4AEBB.10557590--
|
