Le 12 Oct 2004 02:39:58 -0700, ybg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Yusuf B Gursey) écrivit
:
>"bethalan" <bethalan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:<G3fad.5415$5b1.2958@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...
>> Thanks --- To satisfy my curiosity, what references (besides
>> Bescherelle) attest to the existence of [ajwada], and how would it
>
>right now I dont know for this particular word.
>
>there is 'arwaHa "to stink" vs. 'ara:Ha "to give comfort or rest"
>in Wehr.
>
That confirms what I thought : there exist 'consonnant + waw +
consonnant' (concave?) verbs that have two IV forms. Thanks.
Raymond
>> differ in meaning from [ajaada]? (to satisfy my curiosity further,
what
>> does "AFAIK" mean?) Thank you for your reply.
>> "Yusuf B Gursey" <ybg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:222ae656.0410100836.2c712a64@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> "bethalan" <bethalan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:<PrG9d.6785$2u1.6143@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...
>> > So far, I've been unable to find a reference to [ajwada]; the
>> existence
>> > of a Form IV [ajwada] would make theoretical sense if there existed
>> a
>> > Form I [jawada], but this I can also find no reference to. Of
>
>form I strong forms only exist for a few verbs of the form
>CawiCa not CawaCa . see the original (out of print) "Teach Yourself
Arabic"
>
>>> course, I
>>
>> AFAIK existance of form I *jawada is not a neccessary conditon. both
>> forms may exist and they might have slightly different meanings.
>>
>>
>> > could be wrong . . . and then again, perhaps Bescherelle could be
>> wrong.
>> > Bescherelle's forte has been French grammar and I suppose their
>> work on
>> > Arabic grammar could be flawed . . . ??
>> > "Raymond Roy" <belamiNoSpam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> > news:41615076.2889880@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > Are there Arabic verbs that have more than one form for a given
>> Form?
>> >
>> > Let's consider the verb 'j da' (to be or become good). Could Form
>> IV
>> > be
>> > 'ajwada' as well as 'aj da' ?
>> >
>> > According to my Bescherelle, both form exist. If only one of them
>> > correspond to Form IV of 'j da', which form is the other one?
>> >
>> > Shukran.
>> >
>> > Raymond
>> >
>> > --
>> --
|
