On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 22:10:25 -0800, Miss Elaine Eos
<Misc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> In article <slrnene5e3.lkm.chris@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> Chris Croughton <chris@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> I dislike the use of singular 'their' because it grammatically implies
>> the plural, and whichever way it is used seems wrong:
>>
>> "They were playing with their ball."
>> "They was playing with their ball."
>
> True in those examples, however:
>
> The child ran home to get their ball.
> or
> The author signed copies of their book until well after closing time.
>
> Oddly, these scan all right. But perhaps that's just because I grew up
> when this was the preferred substitution for "his" -- sort of the first
> evolution in an attempt to find a comfortable word.
Oddly, I find the second less objectionable than the first. This is
possibly, as you suggest, a matter of familiarity (an 'author' seems
less personal than a 'child', if that makes sense).
> I tend to agree with you about the chip on the shoulder, though. "His"
> was good enough for a thousand years or so of written English, it can be
> good for another 50 years or so until after I'm gone... :)
Probably not that long for me (males in my family rarely get above their
mid eighties, and I'm past my demicentury)...
Chris C
|
