

|
 |
| << Topic |
< Post |
Post 10 of 12 Topic 530 of 629
|
Post > |
Topic >> |
Re: partyer, partier ???
by Chris Croughton <chris@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Jan 5, 2007 at 02:43 PM
| On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 09:36:43 +0000, Richard Polhill
<richard.news@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Richard Polhill wrote:
>
>> This is exactly the model for preferring 'partyer' to 'partier' as an
>> adjective 'party' is implied by the second spelling. Imagine if you
will
>> as sentence involving the compound noun 'party wall' - close in meaning
>> to the original French root 'partie': a share - perhaps it could become
>> acceptable to describe a one wall as 'partier' than another. ;-) I know
>> it sounds awful as there is no adjective 'party', but it would conform
>> to normal English evolution to extend an existing usage this way.
>
> No response to that? Not even a ROFL?
Usenet is not a real-time medium (nor even a small), patricularly for
low-traffic groups like this one and at the holiday season.
> Pah! What are the newsgroups coming to? ;-)
A sticky end, like a currant bun.
BTW, I agree with you about the endings, and that neither spelling looks
like a real word...
Chris C


|
12 Posts in Topic:
|
"Simon" <nos |
2007-01-01 23:51:12 |
|
Einde O'Callaghan <ein |
2007-01-02 23:09:13 |
|
Richard Polhill <richa |
2007-01-03 08:40:38 |
|
Miss Elaine Eos <Misc@ |
2007-01-03 07:10:01 |
|
Einde O'Callaghan <ein |
2007-01-03 18:22:52 |
|
Richard Polhill <richa |
2007-01-04 08:41:58 |
|
Einde O'Callaghan <ein |
2007-01-03 18:15:59 |
|
Richard Polhill <richa |
2007-01-04 08:52:32 |
|
Richard Polhill <richa |
2007-01-05 09:36:43 |
|
Chris Croughton <chris |
2007-01-05 14:43:24 |
|
Richard Polhill <richa |
2007-01-05 16:04:23 |
|
Chris Croughton <chris |
2007-01-06 12:33:43 |
|
Post A Reply:

|
|
|
|