Attuarii wrote:
> Nevermore wrote:
>
>> In <c9adnXyhReZIQTjanZ2dnUVZ_u_inZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Attuarii wrote:
>>> From: Attuarii <chattengau@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> Newsgroups:
alt.islam.sufism,alt.languages.irish,alt.mexico,alt.movies.
>>> christian-bale,alt.pagan,alt.religion.wicca,alt.religion.asatru
>>> Subject: Re: Christians Don't Understand Wicca? Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2008
>>> 10:25:09 -0500 Followup-To: alt.islam.sufism,alt.languages.irish,alt.
>>> mexico,alt.movies.christian-bale,alt.pagan,alt.religion.wicca,alt.
>>> religion.asatru
>>>
>>> Nevermore wrote:
>>>
>>>> In <iMudnYjqmfNdWjjanZ2dnUVZ_o7inZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Attuarii wrote:
>>>>> From: Attuarii <chattengau@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>> Newsgroups: alt.islam.sufism,alt.languages.irish,alt.mexico,alt.
>>>>> movies. christian-bale,alt.pagan,alt.religion.wicca,alt.religion.
>>>>> asatru Subject: Re: Christians Don't Understand Wicca? Date: Sun, 03
>>>>> Feb 2008 08:55:10 -0500
>>>>>
>>>>> Nevermore wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In <rpoaq3lsh8tstlqv6lhagfvht5hr96f5sg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Nik wrote:
>>>>>>> From: Nik <republican@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>>>> Newsgroups: alt.islam.sufism,alt.languages.irish,alt.mexico,alt.
>>>>>>> movies. christian-bale,alt.pagan,alt.religion.wicca,alt.religion.
>>>>>>> asatru Subject: Re: Christians Don't Understand Wicca? Date: Sun,
>>>>>>> 03 Feb 2008 19:46:37 +1300 Organization: Superfeed.net
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:47:03 -0600, Nevermore <burned@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>> net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> In <sfadnUhOdNKMXQfanZ2dnUVZ_o6knZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Attuarii
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> You oughtn't. The Jewish religion was born out of Moses
>>>>>>>>>>> fleeing Egypt.
>>>>>>>>>> Dating on pottery shards across ancient Isreal indicates the
>>>>>>>>>> Hebrews never went anywhere. The Hebrew peoples decended from
>>>>>>>>>> the hills and made up their history out of whole cloth. There
>>>>>>>>>> is no archeological record validating any such stay in Egypt.
>>>>>>>>> Most of the OT is some kind of wholesale fabrication. I recall
>>>>>>>>> reading an archaeological re****t about 1st Century CE Palestine
>>>>>>>>> which claimed that the homes where no writing was found were
>>>>>>>>> the homes of Hebrew speakers. Since all of the texts
>>>>>>>>> discovered on the dig were Greek, that was a convenient
fiction.
>>>>>>>> It's kind of like the argument that "record keeping wasn't all
>>>>>>>> that good back then" or "there were all kinds of `messiahs'
>>>>>>>> running around" to explain why there is no mention of Jesus
>>>>>>>> outside the bible ( a book which, by the way, claims that
>>>>>>>> "throngs" of people came clear "from foreign lands" to hear him
>>>>>>>> speak!).
>>>>>>> Don't the Dead Sea Scrolls refer to Jesus?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nik
>>>>>> No. Actually there is no contem****ary ancient reference to Jesus
>>>>>> outside of the individual "books" of the pseudo-epigraphic gospels
(
>>>>>> Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, etc.) which began appearing in the
>>>>>> Second Century and were selected amongst and cobbled together later
(
>>>>>> when the Gnostic gospels - the Gospel of Mary, Gospel of Judas,
etc.
>>>>>> were tossed out). You can get an excellent history of how Jesus
>>>>>> was essentially made up by googling the Jewish scholarly article
>>>>>> "Refuting Missionaries" and by checking out jesusneverexisted.com
>>>>>> Nevermore
>>>>> http://www.nag-hammadi.com/
>>>> And - like I said - from that very website:
>>>>
>>>> In his story, Mohammed Ali Samman admitted that some pages had been
>>>> lost, burnt or thrown away. Even so, he had laid his hands on a
>>>> fabulous treasure with its Coptic translations, dating back to the
>>>> 2nd century AC, of religious and philosophical texts that were even
>>>> older, initially written in Greek In other words, there are NO
>>>> ancient CONTEM****ARY references to Jesus. The Second Century AD would
>>>> be like having the first references to George Wa****ngton appear in
>>>> 1976!
>>> Big Brother is Goldstein.
>> My accountant?!? I'm not following you, big guy.
>
> The forces which cause one line of verse to follow the previous caused
that
> post. There is meaning to be found, but I can explain it no better than
I
> have.
>
That's a shame. Explanation and communication are interwoven here.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
