On Mar 11, 9:45=A0am, Stig Holmquist <stigfjor...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:24:17 -0700 (PDT), Mensanator
>
>
>
>
>
> <mensana...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >On Mar 10, 8:19=A0pm, Stig Holmquist <stigfjor...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:14:21 -0700 (PDT), Mensanator
>
> >> <mensana...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >On Mar 10, 5:58=A0am, Stig Holmquist <stigfjor...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> >> >> On Sun, 9 Mar 2008 15:56:47 -0700 (PDT), Mensanator
>
> >> >> <mensana...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> >On Mar 9, 2:39?pm, Stig Holmquist <stigfjor...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> >> >> >> If you add up the numbers ein each position after they have
been
> >> >> >> sorted in ascending order
>
> >> >> >Why would you do a silly thing like that?
>
> >> >> >Wouldn't doing stats on which ball is drawn first
> >> >> >be more meaningful?
>
> >> >> If you think stats based on order of draw are more meaningful
>
> >> >It could be. Suppose the two most frequently occuring balls
> >> >drawn are 17 & 18. But they always come up as the first ball
> >> >drawn and almost never in the same drawing. Thus, it may be
> >> >that 17 & 18 are competing for the same bucket (which could
> >> >happen if the balls are loaded into the drum in numerical order
> >> >and not stirred properly as was the case in Illinois in 1984).
>
> >> >> feel free to calculate them
>
> >> >Already have.
>
> >> >> and tell us what is so interesting about them.
>
> >> >Such as actually coming up with winning numbers?
>
> >> >> .Order of draw can be found at various sites. Go ahead.
>
> >> >I won the Illinois Lotto twice. Only match 4's however,
> >> >so I only got about $1000. And shortly thereafter they
> >> >modified the Lotto machines to make them much more random
> >> >and render such statistics meaningless.
>
> >> >>I specifically asked about the PB game, not some state game.
>
> >> What is the significance of deviations from 28 for any of the five
> >> positions of PB?
>
> >**** if I know. The point I'm making is you are assuming without
> >proof that there is none. If you're wrong, then your stats are
> >worthless.
>
> >>The PB numbers are tested rigorously for randomness by MUSL
>
> so if you have any evidence that they are not random
I just said, in the 1984 Illinois Lotto they weren't random.
> please post it or else STFU.
I just did.
> You are making an ass of yourself.
I'm not the ass who's going to lose money playing lotteries.
> So far you have made no
> positive contribution to the subject matter.
Except to point out the fallacy of your plan.
> Your comments are not
> only silly, they are outright stupid.
Sounds like jealousy.
> Good luck with your tests.
Are you crying?
>
> Stig
|
