On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:06:58 -0700 (PDT), Mensanator
<mensanator@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On Mar 11, 9:45 am, Stig Holmquist <stigfjor...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:24:17 -0700 (PDT), Mensanator
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <mensana...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >On Mar 10, 8:19 pm, Stig Holmquist <stigfjor...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:14:21 -0700 (PDT), Mensanator
>>
>> >> <mensana...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> >On Mar 10, 5:58 am, Stig Holmquist <stigfjor...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> >> On Sun, 9 Mar 2008 15:56:47 -0700 (PDT), Mensanator
>>
>> >> >> <mensana...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> >> >On Mar 9, 2:39?pm, Stig Holmquist <stigfjor...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>> >> >> >> If you add up the numbers ein each position after they have
been
>> >> >> >> sorted in ascending order
>>
>> >> >> >Why would you do a silly thing like that?
>>
>> >> >> >Wouldn't doing stats on which ball is drawn first
>> >> >> >be more meaningful?
>>
>> >> >> If you think stats based on order of draw are more meaningful
>>
>> >> >It could be. Suppose the two most frequently occuring balls
>> >> >drawn are 17 & 18. But they always come up as the first ball
>> >> >drawn and almost never in the same drawing. Thus, it may be
>> >> >that 17 & 18 are competing for the same bucket (which could
>> >> >happen if the balls are loaded into the drum in numerical order
>> >> >and not stirred properly as was the case in Illinois in 1984).
>>
>> >> >> feel free to calculate them
>>
>> >> >Already have.
>>
>> >> >> and tell us what is so interesting about them.
>>
>> >> >Such as actually coming up with winning numbers?
>>
>> >> >> .Order of draw can be found at various sites. Go ahead.
>>
>> >> >I won the Illinois Lotto twice. Only match 4's however,
>> >> >so I only got about $1000. And shortly thereafter they
>> >> >modified the Lotto machines to make them much more random
>> >> >and render such statistics meaningless.
>>
>> >> >>I specifically asked about the PB game, not some state game.
>>
>> >> What is the significance of deviations from 28 for any of the five
>> >> positions of PB?
>>
>> >**** if I know. The point I'm making is you are assuming without
>> >proof that there is none. If you're wrong, then your stats are
>> >worthless.
>>
>> >>The PB numbers are tested rigorously for randomness by MUSL
>>
>> so if you have any evidence that they are not random
>
>I just said, in the 1984 Illinois Lotto they weren't random.
>
>> please post it or else STFU.
>
>I just did.
>
>> You are making an ass of yourself.
>
>I'm not the ass who's going to lose money playing lotteries.
>
>> So far you have made no
>> positive contribution to the subject matter.
>
>Except to point out the fallacy of your plan.
>
>> Your comments are not
>> only silly, they are outright stupid.
>
>Sounds like jealousy.
>
>> Good luck with your tests.
>
>Are you crying?
>
>>You should join the Lottery Post bang. They welcoma inane comments like
you make.
You would be very popular there. Here we deal in strict mathematical
problems.
>> Stig
|
