The defect is in the fact that Maple attempts to translate
the Mathematica inputs it CANNOT translate correctly (you
are right here) - and does this without any warning.
The interested reader can find far much more about the
Maplesoft's development process instability, variegated
Maple crashes, howlers and other related stuff in the beta
0.2 of the Review of Maple Crisis we, together with the
VM machine, keep working on preparing to finish and release
soon after Maple 12 will be published
http://maple.bug-list.org/maple-crisis.php
Best wishes,
Vladimir Bondarenko
VM and GEMM architect
Co-founder, CEO, Mathematical Director
http://www.cybertester.com/
Cyber Tester, LLC
http://maple.bug-list.org/
Maple Bugs Encyclopaedia
http://www.CAS-testing.org/
CAS Testing
-----------------------------------------------------------------
"We must understand that technologies
like these are the way of the future."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
On Mar 24, 11:34=A0am, Axel Vogt <&nore...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Vladimir Bondarenko wrote:
> > I know.
>
> > So you rediscovered a defect in Maple's MmaTranslator
> > discovered by the VM machine about 2 years ago.
>
> > :)
>
> > ?MmaTranslator,FromMma
>
> > "The FromMma(Mma_input) calling sequence translates
> > Mathematica input into its Maple input equivalent."
>
> > But Maple's input is not equivalent to Mathematica's one.
>
> No reasonable person would expect that for indexing roots.
>
> Not even in 1 product over several releases I would expect
> that the ordering is the same.
>
> "Some Mathematica commands do not have an exact Maple equivalent;
however,=
the translation can still
> be performed using the MmaTranslator[Mma] subpackage, which contains
comma=
nds based on the existence
> of very similar Maple commands. For more information, see
MmaTranslator[Mm=
a]."
>
> And there you will not find "Root" (but the list is not complete).
>
> So at best the do***entation could be more clear.
>
> Actually this shows a defect in trusting your machine, that's all.
>
> Just solve the task I gave you through my answer, you even have
> been given the solution, just find the way ... will you, can you?
|
