"Lits O'Hate" <litsohate@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:2b331c3d-f0dc-4088-9ab8-bd8825691c27@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On May 1, 3:51 am, JSH <jst...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> You're a nobody, hanging on to get attention.
>
> Oh boy! A 4 AM rant from James Harris! This should be good.
>
>> Where will you be on these newsgroups in 12 years?
>
> Yeah! Hell, one can only envy the progress you've made on
> Usenet in the last 12 years!
that would be 2020, JSH still posting orgional material on the same old
topics about Math dudes lying etc
By then everybody will be sick of the internet and gone back to
newspapers,
and JSH will have his own syndicated comic strip in them.
>
>> Nowhere, unless you're parasitically attaching yourself to other
>> posters like you're doing with me.
>
> Who could resist the op****tunity to correspond with a self-
> described "true, living, super genius?"
It is an HONOR to bask in his reflected sunlight.(someone used this about
5
years ago on a JSH thread)
>
>> Mathematicians lie as a group. My point is that math society is
>> broken.
>
> Not long ago, your "point" was that a parabola is a rotated
> hyperbola. How did that "point" work out?
the point can also be seen as a falure to accept personal limitations.
>
>> At the end of it all, none of you can present facts.
>
> How's this for a fact: James Harris exhibits the symptoms
> of Narcissistic Personality Disorder.
Real question, is can he make money by it ?
Most CEOs are NPD, look at Carlie Fariena former HP CEO.
>
>> You can insult though.
>>
>> I'll give you that, as you're nasty little turds.
>
> And you'd never stoop to insults, of course! When you wrote,
> "or are you the goddamn ***** I know you are," you meant it
> in a loving way.
His language seems more in line with a frustrated libaraian girl about 23
or
so. West Coast.
>
>> My blogs get pathetically few hits.
>
> That's the issue.
That's the internet, zillions of sites.
>
>> That's not the issue.
>
> Yes it is.
Dear Leader JSH brought it up, must be an issue.
>
>> What IS the issue is high rankings for postings of mine on blogs and
>> now I'm ready to simply warn search engines like Google and Yahoo! as
>> I need an explanation.
>>
>> If no one can give me one, then I'll look to the US Congress to force
>> transparency.
>>
>> I see search engines as a utility.
>>
>> If I do not get an answer I will use the bizarrely high search results
>> that I see to push the case that there is something weird going on,
>> and ask for an answer.
>
> It must be "a conspiracy on multiple levels reaching all
> the way into the most prestigious institutions like the
> editorial board of Princeton University."
Bush and Rev Wright must be in on it too.
>
>> So to Google and Yahoo! and the other search engines. You are being
>> warned.
>>
>> I don't have a problem with search results on my blogs disappearing
>> from high levels, but if they stay there, I am warning you that I may
>> use that to push some congressional inquiry and break open how you do
>> what you do.
>>
>> I don't like apparent contradiction.
>>
>> And you are not beyond my ability to drag into Congress to explain.
>> None of you are.
Dragged into Congress for a JSH hearing on why no one goes to his website,
that will fix google for sure, not sure about yahoo.
>>
>> Test me here, and you'll see soon enough how serious I am on this
>> issue.
>
> Pleace 2 be adding me too ur lits to soo.
Can I take the test too ?
>
>> Drop the rankings on my postings or else.
>>
>> And I do not forget that the Google founders are mathematicians. If
>> they are mathematicians first and foremost then they may find that
>> some time behind prison bars is where they will land.
>>
>> I'm tired of the games. I want transparency, or else I'll do my best
>> to force it, even if it breaks business models.
>
> How does it feel to want?
interesting how the mood has changed
>
>> Drop my rankings you idiots. Or I will make you.
>
> There's a real simple way for you to drop, or even remove,
> your blogs from search engine results. Can you figure it out?
>
>> James Harris
>
> --
> "...one man who understand the Internet, I think, far better
> than any of you can possibly come close to comprehending, with,
> your, I'm afraid, um, limited intellects. " -- James Harris
|
