On May 1, 12:51=A0am, JSH <jst...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Apr 30, 4:41 pm, Joel Davison <jo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > JSH wrote:
> > > On Apr 30, 6:16 am, Joel Davison <jo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >> JSH wrote:
> > >>> On Apr 29, 7:59 am, Joel Davison <jo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >>>> Wouldn't you have to say though that the bottom line of all this
> > >>>> "seeking of attention" is nothing more than a symptom of your
> > >>>> Narcissistic Personality Disorder?
> > >>>> I know, by me responding with this post, I'm just feeding your
diso=
rder,
> > >>>> but my main concern here is to ****ne some light on what's really
go=
ing
> > >>>> on with this new-found interest in statistics of yours, and to
set =
the
> > >>>> facts straight for those that might not be aware of your
disorder.
> > >>> There is no new interest in statistics. =A0I've been monitoring
them=
for
> > >>> months; years in some areas.
> > >> Well, I wasn't really expecting you to admit to having NPD.
>
> > >> In fact, you don't have to. Anybody can see from your posts, both
pas=
t
> > >> and present, that you are driven by a Narcissistic Personality
Disord=
er.
> > > So you not only better fit the NPD diagnosis, you show why people
with=
> > > it are so annoying: not able to do on their own they find ways to
put
> > > themselves in positions where they do not belong to get attention
they=
> > > cannot honestly earn.
>
> > You mean like what you've been doing here for the last 12+ years?
>
> You're a nobody, hanging on to get attention.
>
> Where will you be on these newsgroups in 12 years?
>
> Nowhere, unless you're parasitically attaching yourself to other
> posters like you're doing with me.
>
> > > To challenge that observation--I'm giving you a soapbox--tell the
> > > group what else you can talk about besides my supposed mental
illness,=
> > > what other accomplishments you might have, and why in the world
should=
> > > anyone ever listen to you at all?
>
> > That's OK, you can keep your soapbox. I don't want it.
>
> Mathematicians lie as a group. =A0My point is that math society is
> broken.
>
> At the end of it all, none of you can present facts.
>
> You can insult though.
>
> I'll give you that, as you're nasty little turds.
>
> > As long as the "playing field" is now level, and everybody understands
> > why you are so infatuated with how many hits your blog postings are
> > getting in Google, that's all I'm interested in.
>
> > Carry on now. Off you go.
>
> My blogs get pathetically few hits.
>
> That's not the issue.
>
> What IS the issue is high rankings for postings of mine on blogs and
> now I'm ready to simply warn search engines like Google and Yahoo! as
> I need an explanation.
>
> If no one can give me one, then I'll look to the US Congress to force
> transparency.
>
> I see search engines as a utility.
>
> If I do not get an answer I will use the bizarrely high search results
> that I see to push the case that there is something weird going on,
> and ask for an answer.
>
> So to Google and Yahoo! and the other search engines. =A0You are being
> warned.
>
> I don't have a problem with search results on my blogs disappearing
> from high levels, but if they stay there, I am warning you that I may
> use that to push some congressional inquiry and break open how you do
> what you do.
>
> I don't like apparent contradiction.
>
> And you are not beyond my ability to drag into Congress to explain.
> None of you are.
>
> Test me here, and you'll see soon enough how serious I am on this
> issue.
>
> Drop the rankings on my postings or else.
>
> And I do not forget that the Google founders are mathematicians. =A0If
> they are mathematicians first and foremost then they may find that
> some time behind prison bars is where they will land.
>
> I'm tired of the games. =A0I want transparency, or else I'll do my best
> to force it, even if it breaks business models.
>
> Drop my rankings you idiots. =A0Or I will make you.
>
> James Harris- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Hi James,
do you think you could also take google to congress over the spam
postings on sci.math and sci.crypt?
Heck, why stop there!
|
