Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Education > Math Undergrad > Re: Surprising ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 42 of 44 Topic 5071 of 5601
Post > Topic >>

Re: Surprising statistics

by =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Carlos_Santos?= <jcsantos@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 3, 2008 at 12:59 PM

On 03-05-2008 5:29, JSH wrote:

>> One last surprising example from the search logs.  Last month, someone
>> came to my site after searching for "lessons to do with the book dairy
>> of a wimpy kid".  I don't mention "Diary of a Wimpy Kid" anywhere on
>> my site or discuss how to teach children's books.  Nonetheless, one of
>> my pages came up in the top 20 for that search, just because of some
>> coincidental word choices.
>>
> 
> So you think "Diary of a Wimpy Kid" is equivalent to "definition of
> mathematical proof".
> 
> This story is moving fast enough though that there isn't much more for
> me to brainstorm anyway.  For those who don't know, one of the ways I
> use newsgroups is to brainstorm problems as I think better talking
> them out very publicly.
> 
> Math society has ****fted as I've tried out various solutions, from RSA
> yanking the money for their challenges, to the killing of that math
> journal and the hosting university deleting all reference of it from
> their pages.
> 
> But that pails in comparison to the ****fts that far more powerful
> people in the shadow governments have done, even as various political
> regimes have toppled with the latest just occurring in Britain.

I have to admit that I missed that one. What are you talking about?

> But
> the shadows haven't moved against me directly.  They've just nibbled
> around at the edges...  Why am I still alive?

We decided to let you live because you are so damn funny.

> The last battles are playing out in the US where I've at one time or
> another sup****ted all of the current candidates for president, and the
> only question is, who are the ones who have been turned?  Or were any
> of them ever not lost from the beginning?

No. Not one.

> Reality never got simpler.  The battles between certain big players
> never ended.
> 
> It just got more complicated and a lot messier for the people at the
> bottom who unfortunately tend to be the pawns that die very easily, or
> worse, get miserable lives until they die.
> 
> All the prophecies are being fulfilled, it's just they are puzzles to
> be figured out, and I'm unraveling the final ones, as I try to figure
> out the final answers before it's too late.

Bad news: it *is* too late.

> Most of the prophecies indicate some huge die-off, but it seems to me
> that has got to be a ruse or, what's the point?  But then again, the
> door is closing so fast...

Suggestion: get out of the way.

> And why us?  Why is planet earth suddenly such a big deal that so many
> players are wreaking havoc in so many places and sometimes almost
> completely in plain sight?  Like it matters though.  The human fail-
> safes remain as potent as ever.  At least most human beings have that
> wonderful ignorance to get them through the night.
> 
> The rest of us have to fight, even if it looks more and more like
> we're going to lose, because it's still not quite clear what the damn
> war is even over.

Don't worry. It will become clear quite soon.

Best regards,

Jose Carlos Santos
 




 44 Posts in Topic:
JSH: Surprising statistics
JSH <jstevh@[EMAIL PRO  2008-04-28 22:10:04 
Re: JSH: Surprising statistics
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Car  2008-04-29 08:04:18 
Re: Surprising statistics
"Krieg Suden" &  2008-04-29 08:46:46 
Re: Surprising statistics
JSH <jstevh@[EMAIL PRO  2008-04-29 07:21:13 
RE: JSH: Surprising statistics
"Doug" <nosp  2008-04-29 09:49:31 
Re: Surprising statistics
Joel Davison <joelD@[E  2008-04-29 10:59:44 
Re: JSH: Surprising statistics
hagman <google@[EMAIL   2008-04-29 07:25:13 
Re: JSH: Surprising statistics
"Lits O'Hate" &  2008-04-29 16:18:53 
Re: Surprising statistics
JSH <jstevh@[EMAIL PRO  2008-04-29 16:48:37 
Re: Surprising statistics
"Krieg Suden" &  2008-04-29 19:46:41 
Re: Surprising statistics
Joel Davison <joelD@[E  2008-04-30 09:16:16 
Re: Surprising statistics
JSH <jstevh@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-03 07:55:45 
Re: Surprising statistics
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Car  2008-05-03 16:51:37 
Re: Surprising statistics
JSH <jstevh@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-03 09:23:39 
Re: Surprising statistics
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Car  2008-05-03 18:05:07 
Re: Surprising statistics
JSH <jstevh@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-03 10:15:27 
Re: Surprising statistics
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Car  2008-05-03 18:30:09 
Re: Surprising statistics
"Jesse F. Hughes&quo  2008-05-03 15:44:11 
Re: Surprising statistics
richard@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-03 22:18:06 
Re: Surprising statistics
JSH <jstevh@[EMAIL PRO  2008-04-29 18:28:27 
Re: Surprising statistics
JSH <jstevh@[EMAIL PRO  2008-04-30 07:14:15 
Re: Surprising statistics
"Jesse F. Hughes&quo  2008-04-30 10:50:26 
Re: Surprising statistics
Joel Davison <joelD@[E  2008-04-30 19:41:54 
Re: Surprising statistics
"Lits O'Hate" &  2008-04-30 15:53:18 
Re: Surprising statistics
"Srieg Kuden" &  2008-04-30 18:36:23 
Re: Surprising statistics
"Jesse F. Hughes&quo  2008-04-30 20:14:06 
Re: Surprising statistics
JSH <jstevh@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-01 00:51:55 
Re: Surprising statistics
David C. Ullrich <dull  2008-05-01 06:09:34 
Re: Surprising statistics
richard@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-01 21:11:49 
Re: Surprising statistics
"Lits O'Hate" &  2008-05-01 11:04:12 
Re: JSH: James Harris to Sue Google and Yahoo! (was: Surprising
"Lits O'Hate" &  2008-05-01 11:52:08 
Re: JSH: James Harris to Sue Google and Yahoo! (was: Surprising
"Srien Kudeg" &  2008-05-01 14:21:26 
Re: Surprising statistics
amzoti <amzoti@[EMAIL   2008-05-01 13:18:58 
Re: Surprising statistics
JSH <jstevh@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-02 18:43:34 
Re: Surprising statistics
"Jesse F. Hughes&quo  2008-05-02 23:20:14 
Re: Surprising statistics
"Jesse F. Hughes&quo  2008-05-02 23:34:29 
Re: Surprising statistics
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Car  2008-05-03 12:51:17 
Re: Surprising statistics
"Jesse F. Hughes&quo  2008-05-03 08:46:36 
Re: Surprising statistics
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Car  2008-05-03 14:47:57 
Re: Surprising statistics
David C. Ullrich <dull  2008-05-03 04:36:24 
Re: Surprising statistics
JSH <jstevh@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-02 21:29:28 
Re: Surprising statistics
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Car  2008-05-03 12:59:33 
Re: Surprising statistics
rossum <rossum48@[EMAI  2008-05-03 13:57:45 
Re: Surprising statistics
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Car  2008-05-03 14:46:06 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Wed Dec 3 15:15:35 CST 2008.