by William Elliot <marsh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
May 6, 2008 at 01:00 AM
On Mon, 5 May 2008, David C. Ullrich wrote:
> >Theorem.
> > Connected and locally path connected S ==> S path connected.
> >Use the chain rule.
>
> What do you mean by "chain rule"?
>
See my May 5th reply to amu in the thread "topology" of this news group.
> (The phrase "chain rule" usually refers to the theorem/technique
> for differentiating a function defined as the composition of
> two functions...)
>
Not so when we's talking topology.
A chain is a linear ordered subset of an ordered set.
Riddle of the day. Why won't that chain rule work on chains?
