On 1 Jul, 06:14, junoexpress <MTBrenne...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> ...
>
> But I *was* surprised to learn that "the Internet" is going to track
> down the *bad math*. Who will these "people of the Internet" be? Can't
> be mathematicians, they're the "bad guys". But then who could
> understand the math enough to know what was wrong and what was right?
Much simpler than that, of course. IF there is a bad math, THEN it is
just a matter of starting a correct one; and, as to the bad one, you
just need to disprove some key results... from within the correct
system, my friend, of course! (And that's not math anymore, as you can
imagine.)
That's why, BTW -- and, again, of course --, there is no such point I
believe in spotting out "all the errors" systematically: who cares?
Let's just build the new thing, I'd say, and let's even forget the
past, **** it.
IF... THEN... BTW.
-LV
> And then they're going to go through all of the journals. My, my, that
> will take a bit of time, won't it? (Do you have any idea of how long
> it takes to review ONE paper James? No, of course you don't.) Duh...
>
> > When the funding, stops.
> > Remember, my end goal is the same: remove your public financing.
>
> You conveniently forget that colleges still need math teachers: that's
> public funding. Mathematicians will always be employed James. Face it,
> you lose. All you have are your crack pipe dreams.
>
> M
|
