Talk About Network

Google





Education > Math > Re: Embedding a...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 3 Topic 4074 of 4365
Post > Topic >>

Re: Embedding a surface in R^n

by The World Wide Wade <aderamey.addw@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 13, 2008 at 11:27 AM

In article <48295200$0$30466$afc38c87@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
 "Peter Webb" <webbfamily@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> All this talk of Mobius strips makes me wonder ...
> 
> There are lots of 2D surfaces that can be embedded into 3 dimensions,
for 
> example the infinite plane (R^2), sphere, torus etc can all be embedded
in 
> R^3.
> 
> There are some 2D surfaces which cannot, and (I believe) require 4 
> dimensions such as the Klein bottle and cross-cap.
> 
> Is 4D sufficient for all unbounded surfaces? All surfaces? Can a surface
be 
> constructed which needs 5 dimensions?

Yes, yes, and no. See the Whitney Embeding Theorem,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitney_embedding_theorem

> And please, I can't provide a definition of a surface, other than it is
a 2D 
> structure which can be represented by a reasonably behaved function,
such as 
> everywhere continuous (analytic even?).
 




 3 Posts in Topic:
Embedding a surface in R^n
"Peter Webb" &l  2008-05-13 18:32:01 
Re: Embedding a surface in R^n
The World Wide Wade <a  2008-05-13 11:27:20 
Re: Embedding a surface in R^n
"Peter Webb" &l  2008-05-14 22:22:10 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Wed Jan 7 18:50:15 PST 2009.